So nothing will happen. think about what it actually says about the quality of a forum (and the mindset of some of the members) that there exists a thread that asks for the a new account of someone banned multiple times already to be banned also and not only nothing happens (not even one response of a moderator), but some people even ask to remove the topics that this troll is using to promote his self-esteem. Next time someone punches you in the face please remove your head, so that it won't happen again, same logic.
BSD threads on this forum will have the same future than antiBSD trolls have on this forum: nothing will happen, moderation doesn't exist anyways, so just forget it and spew your hate somewhere else, where people might be believe it actually.
Specifically, the whole BSD topic is correct - those who prefer BSD over GPL to degree they replace working components with equivalents but another license, prove the point they are latent proprietary supporters.
They are not free / libre software supporters, not in single degree.
I am ok with that, but when they start post bullcrap about how limiting GPL is, they have to expect counter punch in the face in form of systemd etc.
So either stop writing nonsense or recieve what you send. If you troll, you will probably be trolled back.
But when you try to play net police stating I am angel and ctulhux or whatever is a "bad guy", I have huge desire to ban you both.
I don't consider guy who is essentially trolling back to be breaking any rules, but consider him to be extension of original rule breakage which is tracked to BSD trolls.
If the root of the problem is not banned, newer and newer "please ban XXXX" will emerge.
The sole difference between you two is side of the coin - you are both radical.
Or do you consider banning to be a sign of your final saying and inevitable ultimate culmination of any dispute with you?
Ah Q. how I miss your broken English and anti blob rants. Much better reading than the lot of trolls we have these days with the profanity, incoherent ffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuu moments and thread hijacking. Yeah, I miss Q.
Sidenote: I do think there should be some sort of moderator, at least keeping the illusion that this forum isn't just a degenerates playground and cesspool of spite.
Actually, the root problem of trolling are trolls, not people that don't like trolls.If the root of the problem is not banned, newer and newer "please ban XXXX" will emerge.
Actually it is the method of any sane government. Or would you propose it to be a good idea to never speak about drunk driving and put people that mention that something like it exists into prison, instead of putting the real guilty party, drunk drivers, into the prison?Thats exactly the method of Joseph Stalin.
I strongly recommend to think before writing, otherwise it may be possible that you give evidence for your dumbness.
Actually Linux is kernel and the GPL is licence, none of them is freedom. But following your logic, aren't you making yourself a whore with supporting a distribution, if only with using it, with essential parts licensed under BSD or other permissive "proprietary whore" licenses? Or is that just your normal double standard? Well, you could switch to a free/libre distribution, approved by the FSF, and remove those permissive licensed parts, but you would have a hard time posting your bullshit here.Only Linux and GPL are a true Freedom. BSD license and OS are proprietary whores.
If I could add my $0.02, I don't think that degredation of debate should be a bannable offence.
However, personal attacks, profanity, slander and impersonating other's usernames would be considered grounds to do so, especially for the latter.
damn i hate to admit it but i miss Q too, the trolling in this forum went to the drain when he left
GPL has preserved the freedom of countless numbers of developers, users and software and it has spawned businesses based on free and open source software and millions of high quality, reliable free and open software freely downloadable from the internet with low or no cost and with no DRMs and BDSM user agreements.
Linux (which is GPL licensed) has help create many free operating systems then could be downloaded at no cost. And they outperform the ones put out by M$ and Apple which you have to pay huge to get from somthing that comes with DRMs, spyware, survillance and an agreement that you are under bondage to them.
BSD in constract has contributed to the rise of tyrannical mosters such as M$ and Apple who create software to put their uses under bondage, proliferating DRMs and are now trying to lock down hardware so only thier products and proprietary software can run on it. As a matter of fact:
1. BSD is responsible for Apple's rise and behaviour
2. BSD is responsible for Microsoft rise and behaviour (They gave their TCP/IP)
3. BSD is responsible for DRMs
4. BSD is responsible for binary blobs
5. BSD is responsible for Windows 8
6. BSD is responsible for lack of drivers in Linux
7. BSD is responsible for UEFI restricted booting
8. BSD is responsible for millions under bondage to M$ and Apple
9. BSD is responsible for the problems faced by free and open source projects
10. BSD is responsible for holding back free and open source projects
11. BSD is responsible for todays proprietary software
Let me repeat,Originally Posted by Vim_User
Look at the BSD license, if you place a modification that is GPL or proprietary on BSD licensed code, it becomes GPL or proprietary. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.
There are formally BSD licensed code in the GNU tools but GNU licensed modifications have been added which make the entire code GPL (absolutely no BSD)
Somebody decided to battle them with same weapon, hence appearance of systemd, cthulhux etc. They are response to the problem in form of another problem.
I also highlightened the personal attack, which supports my case of "banning every single BSD troll" (but not BSD user).
You asked - I answered, over.
Whore allows everything for money. Definition of BSD. You think its bad, but in fact its neutral - its state of things.
I think its bad, I don't like girls that do everything for money, I like libre girls that are independent. I support those girls, they have clear goal for the better future.
Hence I don't use BSD(M). But you want to cover it with flowers of justification based upon fallacies. Nope, you will still have same BSD, you can't change the spirit with decorations.
But you and other BSD trolls are suddenly offended when I tell the naked truth.
Instead of covering your falling off "we are open(until we want it so)" camouflage, you begin to attack GPL. Huge mistake, because you point yourself out as freedom hater in disguise.
You suggest me to use GPL-only. Why? If you would use BSD-only, then your BSD would stop existing 10 years ago. Sure, I am vectored at strong copyleft license for a open and clear reason, and I will switch to software that supports the case if it becomes available. I also support GPL so the software with right goal develops. But if its not available, I use what I have; you must excuse me for not following your own lifestyle of living in a cave and "posting bullshit" with a hammer on walls.
Last edited by brosis; 03-20-2013 at 07:56 PM.