Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: Differences Between X.Org, Wayland & Mir

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,357

    Default Differences Between X.Org, Wayland & Mir

    Phoronix: Differences Between X.Org, Wayland & Mir

    Canonical's Christopher Halse Rogers has blogged some more about their views on the Mir Display Server and its design relative to X11/X.Org and Wayland...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMzMTQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    17

    Default

    "Perhaps we'll become so awesome that it'll make sense for GNOME or KDE to rebase their compositors on Mir, but that's a long way away."

    This is priceless. It's been a long day and I needed a laugh.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    416

    Default

    The proof will be in the pudding...and right now that pudding needs to be put together, chilled, and perhaps seasoned a bit before we can try it out, let alone call it "good enough".

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,019

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VoodooSyxx View Post
    "Perhaps we'll become so awesome that it'll make sense for GNOME or KDE to rebase their compositors on Mir, but that's a long way away."

    This is priceless. It's been a long day and I needed a laugh.
    I do wish the people at Canonical could turn down the marketing speak at least once in their lives when they are trying to make a point. The word "awesome" hardly inspires confidence.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    LXDE is on their own.
    They use GTK as well, so they pretty much would have to go with Gnome and Xfce I wager. They will need to get Openbox working on Wayland though probably.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Differences Between X.Org, Wayland & Mir

    Canonical's Christopher Halse Rogers has blogged some more about their views on the Mir Display Server and its design relative to X11/X.Org and Wayland...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMzMTQ
    The writer is up front about the fact that they're just doing it for themselves and not Community, which is good. They aren't claiming to be the end-all-be-all, they are claiming "This is what we felt we needed to do for us." End of story. Not happg about mir, don't like the idea. But if it gets Wayland kicked into gear and the two projects can learn from eachother... I say let Canonical do whatever they want.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    30

    Default Ubuntu only?

    When I first heard of Mir, I was unsure what to think. I was hoping that Canonical was promoting this because Mir was going to be far more awesome than Wayland, and thus every Linux user would want it. However, this story seems to indicate that Mir is mostly about making Unity awesome. Well, I appreciate that Canonical is at least coming clean now. The developers of KDE, Gnome, LXDE, XFCE and other desktop environments will have to make a decision on which path to follow. Unless Mir can offer something great that Wayland doesn't, I suspect Mir will probably become an Ubuntu-only feature. But we'll see.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Candide View Post
    When I first heard of Mir, I was unsure what to think. I was hoping that Canonical was promoting this because Mir was going to be far more awesome than Wayland, and thus every Linux user would want it. However, this story seems to indicate that Mir is mostly about making Unity awesome. Well, I appreciate that Canonical is at least coming clean now. The developers of KDE, Gnome, LXDE, XFCE and other desktop environments will have to make a decision on which path to follow. Unless Mir can offer something great that Wayland doesn't, I suspect Mir will probably become an Ubuntu-only feature. But we'll see.
    RedHat employs a lot of gnome developers, and Red Hat and Intel are pushing Wayland so that's a non-issue

    XFCE uses GTK so they'll follow the gnome guys.

    LXDE is on their own.

    Martin (Kwin upstream maintainer) practically told Ubuntu to go fsck themselves.

    EFL and Enlightenment are backing Wayland.

    The lines in the sand have been drawn, the sides have been chosen. Ubuntu stands alone.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Candide View Post
    When I first heard of Mir, I was unsure what to think. I was hoping that Canonical was promoting this because Mir was going to be far more awesome than Wayland, and thus every Linux user would want it. However, this story seems to indicate that Mir is mostly about making Unity awesome. Well, I appreciate that Canonical is at least coming clean now. The developers of KDE, Gnome, LXDE, XFCE and other desktop environments will have to make a decision on which path to follow. Unless Mir can offer something great that Wayland doesn't, I suspect Mir will probably become an Ubuntu-only feature. But we'll see.
    Maybe the end results will be Mir will be for the front-line, and Wayland for the Richard Stallman end of Linux. Proprietary drivers may only support Mir and the other distros will reply on open source drivers.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by e8hffff View Post
    Maybe the end results will be Mir will be for the front-line, and Wayland for the Richard Stallman end of Linux. Proprietary drivers may only support Mir and the other distros will reply on open source drivers.
    no because nvidia will work on wayland .. there is absolutely 0 reason to believe otherwise.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    209

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnny View Post
    no because nvidia will work on wayland .. there is absolutely 0 reason to believe otherwise.
    no because nvidia's open source driver will work on .. there is absolutely 0 reason to believe otherwise.
    There. Corrected for you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •