Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 97

Thread: Windows 8 Outperforming Ubuntu Linux With Intel OpenGL Graphics

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,375

    Default Windows 8 Outperforming Ubuntu Linux With Intel OpenGL Graphics

    Phoronix: Windows 8 Outperforming Ubuntu Linux With Intel OpenGL Graphics

    In our benchmarks of Microsoft Windows 8, we have found that Intel's Windows OpenGL driver is generally superior to that of their open-source Linux graphics driver. Some progress has been made, but in today's testing of an ASUS Ultrabook bearing an Ivy Bridge processor, Linux has a ways to go for some games in matching the Windows binary performance and features.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18582

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Thank you intel for really putting an effort into your OSS driver development.

  3. #3

    Default

    Well it's a good thing Ubuntu is switching to a much more efficient OpenGL ES 2.0-based interface then. I've always found Unity to be too bloated, even compared to Windows 7 & Aero. So looking forward to the new display server and interface.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    ฿ 16LDJ6Hrd1oN3nCoFL7BypHSEYL84ca1JR
    Posts
    1,026

    Default

    Windows 8 Outperforming Ubuntu Linux[...]
    On a quick glance this title looks like it is saying windows 8 has better performance than linux. Could you use titles like e.g. "Intel driver for windows 8 outperforming intel driver for linux" instead, that better describe what the article wants to say?

    So, this was done with unity's/compiz' compositing. There shouldn't be a noticeable difference for the open source drivers between running opengl on a composited desktop vs on a non-composited one anymore, right?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisXY View Post
    On a quick glance this title looks like it is saying windows 8 has better performance than linux. Could you use titles like e.g. "Intel driver for windows 8 outperforming intel driver for linux" instead, that better describe what the article wants to say?

    So, this was done with unity's/compiz' compositing. There shouldn't be a noticeable difference for the open source drivers between running opengl on a composited desktop vs on a non-composited one anymore, right?
    Ubuntu is faster in OpenArena while Windows is faster in Nexuiz and Xonotic which are using the same engine... The title is nothing, but a FUD. Benchmark Q3 and instead of Nexuiz and Ubuntu will win, but basing on three tests is dumb.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Now you take the values of that benchmark:
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...desktop1&num=1,
    mix them together,
    and see that you will get much more FPS using something like OpenBox.

    And now you have beaten Windows.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    209

    Angry

    Alright, so you decided to do these benchmarks using the obviously most relevant and interesting titles for PC gaming right now available, such as Nexuiz, Xonotic, and OpenArena, and by no means uninteresting and irrelevant titles such as Team Fortress 2, Unigine OilRush, Serious Sam 3, Counter Strike: Source and the like.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    236

    Default

    Also, you decided to do your benchmark with Ubuntu Unity, instead of doing it with KDE. This is a relevant point, since PTS has proven again and again that Ubuntu Unity, unlike KDE, is known to degrade by itself game performance.

    And I'm not even beginning to suggest things like those Martin Grässlin suggested in his blog, like making KWin custom rules to disable compositing on demand when running those games.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,116

    Default

    Again a useless benchmark done with Unity, a DE known for its inpredictable influences on 3D performance. When will Michael learn that this is not the way to do it?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by M1kkko View Post
    Alright, so you decided to do these benchmarks using the obviously most relevant and interesting titles for PC gaming right now available, such as Nexuiz, Xonotic, and OpenArena, and by no means uninteresting and irrelevant titles such as Team Fortress 2, Unigine OilRush, Serious Sam 3, Counter Strike: Source and the like.
    All the newer games you listed run on DirectX under Windows. How should he have compared the openGL performance between the OSes this way??

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •