Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: GNOME 3.8 Release Candidate Now Available

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    10,215

    Default GNOME 3.8 Release Candidate Now Available

    Phoronix: GNOME 3.8 Release Candidate Now Available

    GNOME 3.7.92 has been released, a.k.a. the release candidate for GNOME 3.8...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMzMjk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Newburyport, MA
    Posts
    634

    Default

    I tried gnome 3 the other day for the first time, in virtualbox, and I gotta say I don't hate it. It isn't my cup of tea and I find it relatively slow to work with on a desktop but I think it makes a very nice tablet DE. What bothers me most about it is how it seems to be equally as restricting as a jailbroken iOS, and I don't like how fallback mode is now removed. I also think shading should be enabled by default, since you can't minimize anything.

    However, considering GNOME 3's hardware demands and the fact it isn't practical outside of casual PC/tablet usage, I do not think it should qualify as the linux default anymore. I strongly feel XFCE should take the new title of linux default, considering how balanced it is in usability, performance, compatibility, and features.

    I think the reason GNOME 3 is hated so much is because it isn't really GNOME anymore, just as how Windows 8 doesn't feel like Windows anymore. I'm sure there'd be a lot less hate for GNOME 3 if it had a completely different name, and if it didn't lack so many features that even Windows 95 would have.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    513

    Default

    Gnome 3.8. The version at which gnome died. Since there is no more fallback gnome will see another decline in user numbers.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    115

    Default

    But in the contrary, is not bad as a desktop DE and is very keyboard friendly so you cant work without touching to mouch the mouse (more fast).

    EDIT: there is no fallback mode, but there is a 'classic mode' with maintained core classic extensions.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Newburyport, MA
    Posts
    634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Gnome 3.8. The version at which gnome died. Since there is no more fallback gnome will see another decline in user numbers.
    I'm not sure if there would be a decline. I don't see the appeal of Gnome 3 without using it's standard interface, otherwise you might as well use XFCE or Cinnamon where you get basically the same experience but with more customization. Besides, it isn't necessarily a bad thing that gnome is removing fallback mode because it helps get people with the ancient crappy hardware to move on. As I see it, pretty much any 64 bit compatible (x86) system should be capable of running GNOME 3 just fine, with the exception of VIA users. You could argue that fallback mode would be necessary if your GPU drivers fail, but IIRC, LLVM is supposed to be a quick temporary fix for that. When I tried GNOME 3 I didn't have the GPU drivers installed and it was running relatively smooth; it was usable, I'll put it that way.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56

    Default

    A few hours ago I gave Gnome 3 another spin... and now I'm back to KDE.

    The performance of Gnome 3 is unacceptable on my Laptop, it kind of "lags" when moving windows (enough to consider it a nuisance). Gnome "classic" seemed to have the same problem, and it felt very very incomplete to me.

    Is Gnome "classic" fallback mode?

    Anyhow, I can't wait for Gnome 4 .
    Last edited by j2723; 03-21-2013 at 01:58 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j2723 View Post
    A few hours ago I gave Gnome 3 another spin... and now I'm back to KDE.

    The performance of Gnome 3 is unacceptable on my Laptop, it kind of "lags" when moving windows (enough to consider it a nuisance). Gnome "classic" seemed to have the same problem, and it felt very very incomplete to me.

    Is Gnome "classic" fallback mode?
    There's no longer a 2d "fallback mode". In gnome 3.8, "gnome classic" is gnome-shell with a more "classic" gnome2-like layout, but its still gnome-shell and needs 3d acceleration.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bwat47 View Post
    There's no longer a 2d "fallback mode". In gnome 3.8, "gnome classic" is gnome-shell with a more "classic" gnome2-like layout, but its still gnome-shell and needs 3d acceleration.
    That probably explains the "lags" I was experiencing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    75

    Default

    I hope there will be a way to easily install Gnome 3.8 on Fedora before Fedora 19 gets released...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Newburyport, MA
    Posts
    634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bucic View Post
    I hope there will be a way to easily install Gnome 3.8 on Fedora before Fedora 19 gets released...
    Are you having problems installing gnome on fedora now? Fedora is actually where I tried it out earlier this week and I didn't get any problems. It took a really long time to install but it was successful.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •