Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: GCC 4.8 Release Brings Improved C++11, Optimizations

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,548

    Default GCC 4.8 Release Brings Improved C++11, Optimizations

    Phoronix: GCC 4.8 Release Brings Improved C++11, Optimizations

    GCC 4.8 has been officially released today as the annual major update to the GNU Compiler Collection...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMzMzk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    21

    Default some benchmark graphs

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: GCC 4.8 Release Brings Improved C++11, Optimizations

    GCC 4.8 has been officially released today as the annual major update to the GNU Compiler Collection...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMzMzk

    Fenrus Linux went to the RC on March 17th; the graphs at http://linux.fenrus.org/performance/ show that there's modest increases in the cray and graphics-magick tests, and a regression in fhourstones... with everything else being basically flat.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    283

    Default

    Quick question: when you say "support for new Broadwell instruction set", do you mean the compiler automatically chooses instructions from that instruction set when necessary ?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    124

    Default

    "Support for the new Intel processor codename Broadwell with RDSEED, ADCX, ADOX, PREFETCHW is available through -madx, -mprfchw, -mrdseed command-line options."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    283

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by startzz View Post
    "Support for the new Intel processor codename Broadwell with RDSEED, ADCX, ADOX, PREFETCHW is available through -madx, -mprfchw, -mrdseed command-line options."
    Not exactly what I meant... What I mean is if you enable the instructions, how does the compiler decide when to use them ? Because being specialized instructions, I don't see them being used for things like conditionals and simple math operations which are the most common used operations in a program. What I really mean is that everytime I have seen code optimized for a specific processor instruction set, the coding is done in assembler, not using a c/c++ compiler...

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wargames View Post
    Not exactly what I meant... What I mean is if you enable the instructions, how does the compiler decide when to use them ? Because being specialized instructions, I don't see them being used for things like conditionals and simple math operations which are the most common used operations in a program. What I really mean is that everytime I have seen code optimized for a specific processor instruction set, the coding is done in assembler, not using a c/c++ compiler...

    In all likelihood, it does not. It would just have support for intrinsics to make it easier to use them. That is how support for many instructions is added.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    157

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wargames View Post
    Not exactly what I meant... What I mean is if you enable the instructions, how does the compiler decide when to use them ? Because being specialized instructions, I don't see them being used for things like conditionals and simple math operations which are the most common used operations in a program. What I really mean is that everytime I have seen code optimized for a specific processor instruction set, the coding is done in assembler, not using a c/c++ compiler...
    Prefetch is pretty generic and has been supported in GCC for more than a decade and half since AMD introduced it in 3DNow!, so I fully expect GCC to be able to take advantage of that automatically.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    21

    Default prefetch

    Quote Originally Posted by carewolf View Post
    Prefetch is pretty generic and has been supported in GCC for more than a decade and half since AMD introduced it in 3DNow!, so I fully expect GCC to be able to take advantage of that automatically.
    The Prefetch instruction (and in this case "prefetchw") is almost always a loss. Hardware nowadays has pretty aggressive prefetchers that work on the actual access pattern, and those are very effective for most cases.

    The problem is that for the cases where it's not (e.g. the ones hard to tell by a machine) are also the ones where the compiler will have a hard time adding their own prefetches. (there are some special cases in HPC and such where the human can know special things)


    it's branch prediction hints all over again in many ways, where a broad use is damage because programmers know their own program not as well as the cpu does ;-)

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fenrus View Post
    The Prefetch instruction (and in this case "prefetchw") is almost always a loss. Hardware nowadays has pretty aggressive prefetchers that work on the actual access pattern, and those are very effective for most cases.

    The problem is that for the cases where it's not (e.g. the ones hard to tell by a machine) are also the ones where the compiler will have a hard time adding their own prefetches. (there are some special cases in HPC and such where the human can know special things)


    it's branch prediction hints all over again in many ways, where a broad use is damage because programmers know their own program not as well as the cpu does ;-)
    If you set -mtune=<architecture>, then prefetchw might actually be useful. With that said, the only people that will benefit from it are those building software themselves (i.e. Gentoo users).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryao View Post
    If you set -mtune=<architecture>, then prefetchw might actually be useful. With that said, the only people that will benefit from it are those building software themselves (i.e. Gentoo users).

    eh how?
    if you think that the compiler can insert a better prefetchw than the hardware prefetchers.. please speak up with an example...


    (disclaimer: I work for Intel on Linux, and also have my own hobby OS that I build in my spare time... I look at compilers and compiler options a lot ;-) )

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •