Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Intel Still Works On Driver For Left 4 Dead 2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,424

    Default Intel Still Works On Driver For Left 4 Dead 2

    Phoronix: Intel Still Works On Driver For Left 4 Dead 2

    While Left 4 Dead 2 still hasn't been released to the general Linux gaming public, it's coming. Intel open-source developers are also continuing to work on optimizing the Source Engine game for their Linux graphics driver...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTMzODI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,518

    Default

    Any update on the benchmarks you were planing to do with steam?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    77

    Default

    Changing from BOOL to BITSET_WORD interesting.

    Finally found what it is: http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/bitset/bitset/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gQuigs View Post
    Changing from BOOL to BITSET_WORD interesting.

    Finally found what it is: http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/bitset/bitset/
    We're actually not using that implementation of a bitset (Mesa has its own implementation)...but it's the same concept. It took me a few reads to figure out where the speed up came from - it's the fact that Eric was able to do set operations on 32 bits at a time, rather than 1 boolean at a time. Pretty nice.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,932

    Default Why a dedicated graphics card?

    Will Left 4 Dead 2 run smooth on a Intel processor?

    Then is there any reason to buy a AMD or Nvidia dedicated graphics card?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,911

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Will Left 4 Dead 2 run smooth on a Intel processor?

    Then is there any reason to buy a AMD or Nvidia dedicated graphics card?
    The Source engine has always worked pretty well on weak hardware. It's probably not the reason to buy a discrete card, unless you want to turn up AA/AF settings with high resolutions.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Will Left 4 Dead 2 run smooth on a Intel processor?

    Then is there any reason to buy a AMD or Nvidia dedicated graphics card?
    General speaking when it comes to gaming, you need to have a graphics card.

    Onboard chips always lagged the power needed for gaming.

    But how important a driver is, is proved by amd.

    With the much faster hardware, they do not out perform the intel onboard as they should......

    And like smitty3268, said, it depends on what you want.
    If you want full AA, and all options in game set to high, you need a dedicated grahics card.
    And a fast one, which you replace once every two years.

    To give you an example:
    Serious Sam 3 on my pc.
    Amd phenom II X4 @3.2 ghz with 4 gig of ram, is fast enough but my HD 5750 with 1 gig of ram is not fast enough to handle everything on high setting. ( not on windows directX either )
    Last edited by Gps4l; 03-29-2013 at 05:38 PM.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    Will Left 4 Dead 2 run smooth on a Intel processor?

    Then is there any reason to buy a AMD or Nvidia dedicated graphics card?
    The HD4000 will be fine if you want to run on lowest possible graphics settings at 800x600~1366x768 resolution.

    For everything else get a real GPU. The only reason game companies ensure their games will even run on Intel GPUs at all is the massive installed base of craptacular Dell/HP/Acer boxes out there.

    The game will run, just barely, so that the player will whine online about how slow it plays only to be told they need to purchase a GPU that can actually run the game well. The game company isn't hurt, they made their sale, you just failed to meet the recommended system requirements.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    440

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    The HD4000 will be fine if you want to run on lowest possible graphics settings at 800x600~1366x768 resolution.

    The game will run, just barely, so that the player will whine online about how slow it plays only to be told they need to purchase a GPU that can actually run the game well.
    I have an Ivy Bridge i5 (HD4000 graphics). These statements lie in direct contrast to my experience: L4D2 runs fine on my hardware at 1366x768.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,598

    Default

    @Kayden

    Will those performance fixes get into the mesa 9.1 branch too?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •