Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 55 of 55

Thread: Is Valve's Steam antithetical to Linux and the very core of the open source spirit?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanLamb View Post
    This is the worst logic, that Valve has somehow "earned" a rightful competition free monopoly on taking a revenue cut on games completely developed and funded by others. For games that Valve funds/develops, sure they should get revenue for those.
    There is nothing wrong with that logic but there is something wrong with yours. Valve has to run steam, which includes indefinitely hosting a growing number of games. The bandwidth, hosting, and technical competence does not come free, thus it's impossible to offer the service for free and why should they?

    They may have a solid position on the market but steam is not a natural monopoly other than the desire to have all your games under one service. Anyone can self publish a game and yet valves customers, which includes both publishers and gamers, find it beneficial to utilise the steam platform. That's the market working.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanLamb View Post
    From Randy Pitchford:

    What he is saying is just wildly obvious. Some devs are happy, because Valve could use their notoriety to generate hype and therefore revenue, but this general mindset that Valve has rightfully "earned" a substantial, secret share of other developers games and there is this group think that they should have a monopoly on doing so is ridiculous.
    He's not saying anything. Which I suppose is the kind of argument you seem to like best - one that's full of innuendo, rumour and suspicion with no actual evidence or facts to back anything up.

    Where are all these exploited small guys? Name 5. Nah, don't tax yourself, name 3.

    And this quote is from 2009 and brighter (sober?) members of Gearbox soon backpedalled his rant http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news...Steam-Comments
    and there's this story from one of the "small guys" - read how much he hates Steam http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news...eam-Criticisms but, I'm sure you've read all of these stories as part of your thorough and extensive research into Steam. Anyone accusing you of simply finding the first negative story about steam you could and posting it as though it proved anything you've said would, of course, be totally wide of the mark, wouldn't they?

    It's 2013 now. Look at Gearbox's actions with regard to Steam, not the 2009 "I'm cutting my own throat putting my games on steam" nonsense. Go and ask Gearbox now how unhappy they are with Steam. Now that borderlands, borderlands 2, xcom et al are on there.

    For a guy that supposedly doesn't want Steam to win, he's acting very oddly.

    Why do you suppose is it the small guys that seem to be creating linux versions of their Steam hosted games if they are so badly exploited by the service?

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    106

    Default Linux doesn't need a Steam at all for games.

    So your main problem with Steam is that it takes rights away from open source games, but then you also complain that Steam shouldn't exist on Linux at _all_?

    Try some Source games through Wine and then come back to tell me what a pleasant experience it was. Now that we finally have these things natively on Linux (and there's even more to come) where the _hell_ would you suddenly get it in your head that that's somehow a bad thing?

    And about the whole "Steam takes away our rights" argument; if you don't want to do that, then bloody don't do it. Most "decent" games on Linux are freely available in the repos anyway. If you _gotta_ have a client, use Desura.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanLamb View Post
    From Randy Pitchford:



    What he is saying is just wildly obvious. Some devs are happy, because Valve could use their notoriety to generate hype and therefore revenue, but this general mindset that Valve has rightfully "earned" a substantial, secret share of other developers games and there is this group think that they should have a monopoly on doing so is ridiculous.
    And we all know hoe reliable that ass hole is.

    If you don't have a clue what I referring too:

    http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/20...ect-final-game

    That asshole showed a vid, and claimed it was actual gameplay.

    To quote a fellow mapper / gamer about something Randy said.

    I have been stealing all my life from Aliens, now its time to rip off the fans.

    Borderlands :
    http://savenload.wordpress.com/2010/...y-codehunters/

    Borderlands more than inspired by CodeHunters

    January 11, 2010 – 1:08 am
    Posted in Gaming
    Tagged art style, Borderlands, CodeHunters, copy, PR, Randy Pitchford

    quote:
    I loved the time spent in Borderlands. Every minute of it. The game was up there in my best of 09 list. I’m saying “was” because of this video of CodeHunters, winner of the “Best Design” award at the 2007 Berlin Internet Film Festival. Yeah, that’s right Borderlands, you have been demoted for copying and not giving credit. Lots of similarities between the two and I find it somewhat strange that this was kept quiet until now.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zxcvbnm View Post
    Where are all these exploited small guys? Name 5. Nah, don't tax yourself, name 3.
    My points are broader than specific developers.

    Quote Originally Posted by zxcvbnm View Post
    And this quote is from 2009 and brighter (sober?) members of Gearbox soon backpedalled his rant http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news...Steam-Comments
    and there's this story from one of the "small guys" - read how much he hates Steam http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news...eam-Criticisms but, I'm sure you've read all of these stories as part of your thorough and extensive research into Steam. Anyone accusing you of simply finding the first negative story about steam you could and posting it as though it proved anything you've said would, of course, be totally wide of the mark, wouldn't they?

    It's 2013 now. Look at Gearbox's actions with regard to Steam, not the 2009 "I'm cutting my own throat putting my games on steam" nonsense. Go and ask Gearbox now how unhappy they are with Steam. Now that borderlands, borderlands 2, xcom et al are on there.

    For a guy that supposedly doesn't want Steam to win, he's acting very oddly.

    Why do you suppose is it the small guys that seem to be creating linux versions of their Steam hosted games if they are so badly exploited by the service?
    I did read the counter points and I read the articles that you linked. I understand some indie developers and some customers are absolutely fanatical about Valve. Gearbox is also trying to be political about it and it's not in their sole interest to be the Valve/Steam bashers. I don't think Randy Pitchford is in a position to champion some war against Steam. He is just one guy inside of one development shop.

    Many developers are eager to use Steam because Steam has such a lock on PC gaming. Developers are under pressure to use what the masses of consumers demand.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •