Page 6 of 29 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 283

Thread: AMD Releases Open-Source UVD Video Support

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brent View Post
    Modern video codecs are integer-based and no matter how decoding is done, the result is exactly the same, bit for bit. There is no quality difference.
    It is true that e.g. H.264 decoding is specified to be bit-exact, so any compliant decoder will produce the exact same output as the reference decoder. But some implementations choose to forego compliance for speed.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Quick question: is this going to make my 4200 mobile card run any faster? Because Unity and Gnome3 still run really slow.
    Last edited by teahopper; 04-03-2013 at 08:02 AM.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    157

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by teahopper View Post
    Quick question: is this going to make my 4200 mobile card run any faster? Because Unity and Gnome3 still run really slow.
    NO. Only more memory or software tweaks/improvements can do that.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chithanh View Post
    It is true that e.g. H.264 decoding is specified to be bit-exact, so any compliant decoder will produce the exact same output as the reference decoder. But some implementations choose to forego compliance for speed.
    Specifications (for H.264/VP8/VC-1/etc) say that decoding MUST be bit-exact. If your implementation chooses to ignore that, it's not a compliant decoder. Of course you can do whatever the hell you want if you ignore specifications, but you can't call it a decoder for a particular codec.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brent View Post
    Specifications (for H.264/VP8/VC-1/etc) say that decoding MUST be bit-exact. If your implementation chooses to ignore that, it's not a compliant decoder. Of course you can do whatever the hell you want if you ignore specifications, but you can't call it a decoder for a particular codec.
    Checking if the decoders are compliant is something that could be important as well, actually.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morpheus View Post
    We still don't have complete Bluray support, so I'm not seeing a HTPC in my living room befor a long, long time.

    Anyway it's a very good news to read for (at least partial) open source !
    It will decode bluray JUST FINE. It just won't decode bluray ***3D*** (which is a retarded fad to begin with).

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    It will decode bluray JUST FINE.
    From what I know it either needs to be unencrypted one or user needs to get the AACS keys for the disk first if it is encrypted. Not really plug & play method

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    99

    Default Enough people support AMD

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonadow View Post
    Not quite. Have you seem Anandtech's recent review on Haswell's GT2 and GT3 gpu cores? They can reportedly comfortably compete with an Nvidia 650M. With graphics power and nearly full FOSS support, who would choose an AMD setup over an Intel one for HTPCs?
    I, for one, choose to use AMD based systems. If it does what I need it to do, why not use AMD kit? Also, Intel needs competiton to keep them honest and pushing innovation.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    202

    Default

    One more reason to support AMD and buy AMD graphic cards instead of Nvidia.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,145

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryszardzonk View Post
    From what I know it either needs to be unencrypted one or user needs to get the AACS keys for the disk first if it is encrypted. Not really plug & play method
    That stuff has nothing at all to do with hardware video decoding. At least not on this platform.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •