Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Mozilla & Samsung Develop "Servo" Browser Engine

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    This announcement said a few things to me....
    I think you're probably reading too much into it though. This isn't about Firefox moving from Gecko to Servo - it's an experimental engine, designed to establish how things could be done better. It might eventually replace Gecko - but more likely, it'll result in ideas propagating back to be applied to the existing engine.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    63

    Default

    note that what more or less happened is that some samsung guys dropped the code and mozilla was like "oh hey cool thanks!" and also "lets talk about this!" because talking about this - servo, rust that is - is a good thing anyway - even thus samsung probably develop stuff on their side in the dark and suddenly drop code.

    rust is a pretty damn nice language. its fast and safe. C++ kind of fast. And servo attempts to implement everything a modern browser should ideally be.

    Also, Contrarily to comment 2.. Mozilla actually.. develop and take decisions fully in the open. Heck even the security reviews are public. The security meetings.. are public. It's not about the source code being open, but their whole process is open. You can participate to decisions if you want. Not by commenting here, not by posting a single bug (although if its really insightful, people will certainly take it into account), but by actively taking part of the project (this does take time) and make your voice heard.

    I'm sure Mozilla isn't perfect (far from it) and some people there either, but its pretty damn nearer to my ideals than other companies, personally. At least they seems to really attempt to "do no evil". The corporation is governed by a foundation, everything's open and they usually fight for privacy and user control against the odds.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by balouba View Post
    note that what more or less happened is that some samsung guys dropped the code and mozilla was like "oh hey cool thanks!" and also "lets talk about this!" because talking about this - servo, rust that is - is a good thing anyway - even thus samsung probably develop stuff on their side in the dark and suddenly drop code.

    rust is a pretty damn nice language. its fast and safe. C++ kind of fast. And servo attempts to implement everything a modern browser should ideally be.

    Also, Contrarily to comment 2.. Mozilla actually.. develop and take decisions fully in the open. Heck even the security reviews are public. The security meetings.. are public. It's not about the source code being open, but their whole process is open. You can participate to decisions if you want. Not by commenting here, not by posting a single bug (although if its really insightful, people will certainly take it into account), but by actively taking part of the project (this does take time) and make your voice heard.

    I'm sure Mozilla isn't perfect (far from it) and some people there either, but its pretty damn nearer to my ideals than other companies, personally. At least they seems to really attempt to "do no evil". The corporation is governed by a foundation, everything's open and they usually fight for privacy and user control against the odds.

    Actually, Rust and Servo have been in development for about a year now. The source code is completely open, go download it. Most of the work on these two have been done by Mozilla employees.
    What Mozilla have announced today is that Samsung will help port Servo to ARM hardware only.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mayankleoboy1 View Post
    Actually, Rust and Servo have been in development for about a year now. The source code is completely open, go download it. Most of the work on these two have been done by Mozilla employees.
    What Mozilla have announced today is that Samsung will help port Servo to ARM hardware only.
    Actually Rust has been in development since 2006 with Mozilla being fully involved since 2009. It was one of those experimental projects that have only gained press attention recently though.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    563

    Default

    and they usually fight for privacy and user control against the odds.
    They allow third party cookies, do not enable "do not track" by default and use Google as default search engine. On top of that, they frequently promote Facebook, Twitter or such. Seems legit.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12

    Default

    I wonder if this is a move to get Firefox included as the default browser with Tizen?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,085

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BW~Merlin View Post
    I wonder if this is a move to get Firefox included as the default browser with Tizen?
    Tizen??? Whats that???



    ... yeah, I'm just poking fun.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    142

    Default

    Funny that now they are so keen switching their browser engine. I remember a discussion if they should switch to webkit and one of the core arguments against was that all addons would need to be rewritten. Well but the same applies when they switch to Servo of course....

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nuc!eoN View Post
    Funny that now they are so keen switching their browser engine. I remember a discussion if they should switch to webkit and one of the core arguments against was that all addons would need to be rewritten. Well but the same applies when they switch to Servo of course....
    Difference being that they are making Servo so they can make it compatible with existing addons.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calinou View Post
    They allow third party cookies, do not enable "do not track" by default and use Google as default search engine. On top of that, they frequently promote Facebook, Twitter or such. Seems legit.

    no third party cookies break some sites. do not track by default would kill the standard. google is the best most well known search engine.

    All of which have on/off choices available.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •