Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 56

Thread: NVIDIA Has Major New Linux Driver: Optimus, RandR 1.4

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Licaon View Post
    You mean only cards older than GTX4xx, right?
    Those are the only ones I happened to have access to. I never heard that GTX400 cards and newer can't overclock, but I suppose I don't have a reason to doubt that. Honestly though, aside from testing for stability, OS GPU overclocking tools aren't really the best way to go because they're always temporary. I personally replace the GPU BIOS, so I don't have to worry about an OS not supporting the higher clock speeds known to work.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    873

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    Those are the only ones I happened to have access to. I never heard that GTX400 cards and newer can't overclock, but I suppose I don't have a reason to doubt that. Honestly though, aside from testing for stability, OS GPU overclocking tools aren't really the best way to go because they're always temporary. I personally replace the GPU BIOS, so I don't have to worry about an OS not supporting the higher clock speeds known to work.
    Yeah, Michael has mentioned in previous articles that the Fermi and Kepler series of cards don't support overclocking when using the Nvidia binary drivers.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Veerappan View Post
    Yeah, Michael has mentioned in previous articles that the Fermi and Kepler series of cards don't support overclocking when using the Nvidia binary drivers.
    Do they work in Windows?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    150

    Default

    I'm pretty close to getting "Optimus" working. Unfortunately, my Nvidia card isn't wired to HDMI or any output and the LVDS doesn't want to play nice.

    I'm getting a blank, backlit screen. X will start without complaining, run programs invisibly and glxinfo will report Nvidia, but there's nothing on the LVDS or HDMI.

    Unity and other DEs will try to load, but report framebuffer errors.

    Providers for Nvidia and modesetting (or Intel, I've tested both) report properly.

    Clevo W150HRM
    Core i7 2630QM
    Nvidia GT 555M
    Ubuntu 13.04
    Linux 3.9-rc6
    xorg-edgers and xrandr 1.4

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scali View Post
    Optimus has been advertised as a feature for Windows 7 specifically: http://www.nvidia.com/object/optimus_technology.html
    "* Optimus requires Windows 7 or later"
    XP/Vista users don't get that feature either (because the OS lacks support), so I'm not sure why linux users felt they were entitled to the functionality in the first place. nVidia tried to offer some kernel patches to enable Optimus in the past, but these were not accepted. Now they are using an alternative approach using a feature in RandR 1.4 (which wasn't available at the time Optimus was introduced).
    Kinda sorta right. XP Doesnt support optimus at all. Vista CAN support it but it requires a BIOS flag. This issue came up at linux.conf.au (I forget which speaker... was David, Daniel or Keith) Vista had to have a hardware (read: BIOS) flag to switch between the GPUs, OS X mandates a hardware flag just to make sure it works properly, Win7 doesnt require a hardware flag. Became an issue of "Well OS X does it this way... Windows does it the opposite way... which do we do?"

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Nvidia's kernel patches and dma-buf suggestions were implemented in a way that satisfied 90% of what they wanted. It's the main reason why this requires the unreleased 3.9 kernel.

    They couldn't use randr 1.4 without it.
    Last edited by LLStarks; 04-10-2013 at 11:51 AM.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    55

    Default

    For me this driver is not realy good.
    With this driver i have a lot of spam like
    Code:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556429] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: Xorg/7764
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556478] caller is _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556480] Pid: 7764, comm: Xorg Tainted: P           O 3.9.0-rc6-experimental-amd64 #1
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556482] Call Trace:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556485]  [<ffffffff811a1a11>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc9/0xe0
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556534]  [<ffffffffa189369b>] ? _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556593]  [<ffffffffa13ebbe3>] ? _nv015426rm+0x34/0x17a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556652]  [<ffffffffa13ebd68>] ? _nv015427rm+0x3f/0x78 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556710]  [<ffffffffa13ebf70>] ? _nv015422rm+0x49/0x79 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556837]  [<ffffffffa16d0698>] ? _nv007827rm+0x636/0xb4e [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556963]  [<ffffffffa169fea2>] ? _nv006969rm+0xae2/0xfa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557020]  [<ffffffffa13db32c>] ? _nv000778rm+0x404/0x485 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557086]  [<ffffffffa13cfb17>] ? _nv000699rm+0xa8/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557149]  [<ffffffffa13cfada>] ? _nv000699rm+0x6b/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557204]  [<ffffffffa188ff6d>] ? _nv000790rm+0x4bd/0x9ee [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557256]  [<ffffffffa189940b>] ? rm_ioctl+0x76/0x100 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557303]  [<ffffffffa18b687f>] ? nv_kern_ioctl+0x334/0x39a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557351]  [<ffffffffa18b691b>] ? nv_kern_unlocked_ioctl+0x19/0x1d [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557354]  [<ffffffff810f87c2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x1e/0x31
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557357]  [<ffffffff810f8f9f>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x3b4/0x3f6
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557361]  [<ffffffff810ebb47>] ? fdget+0xe/0x17
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557363]  [<ffffffff810ec2c0>] ? vfs_read+0xac/0xf5
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557367]  [<ffffffff810f902e>] ? sys_ioctl+0x4d/0x7b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557370]  [<ffffffff8135cbe9>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557375] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: Xorg/7764
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557424] caller is _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557427] Pid: 7764, comm: Xorg Tainted: P           O 3.9.0-rc6-experimental-amd64 #1
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557428] Call Trace:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557431]  [<ffffffff811a1a11>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc9/0xe0
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557480]  [<ffffffffa189369b>] ? _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557539]  [<ffffffffa13ebbe3>] ? _nv015426rm+0x34/0x17a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557598]  [<ffffffffa13ebd68>] ? _nv015427rm+0x3f/0x78 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557725]  [<ffffffffa16d1528>] ? _nv013974rm+0x978/0x1960 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557852]  [<ffffffffa16c9696>] ? _nv003406rm+0x47f1/0xb1bd [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557977]  [<ffffffffa16942bd>] ? _nv006653rm+0x5a/0xa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558025]  [<ffffffffa168bfc0>] ? _nv006968rm+0x1a8/0x1c3 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558238]  [<ffffffffa16a008a>] ? _nv006969rm+0xcca/0xfa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558300]  [<ffffffffa13db32c>] ? _nv000778rm+0x404/0x485 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558361]  [<ffffffffa13cfb17>] ? _nv000699rm+0xa8/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558419]  [<ffffffffa13cfada>] ? _nv000699rm+0x6b/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558471]  [<ffffffffa188ff6d>] ? _nv000790rm+0x4bd/0x9ee [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558520]  [<ffffffffa189940b>] ? rm_ioctl+0x76/0x100 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558567]  [<ffffffffa18b687f>] ? nv_kern_ioctl+0x334/0x39a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558613]  [<ffffffffa18b691b>] ? nv_kern_unlocked_ioctl+0x19/0x1d [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558615]  [<ffffffff810f87c2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x1e/0x31
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558618]  [<ffffffff810f8f9f>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x3b4/0x3f6
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558621]  [<ffffffff810ebb47>] ? fdget+0xe/0x17
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558623]  [<ffffffff810ec2c0>] ? vfs_read+0xac/0xf5
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558626]  [<ffffffff810f902e>] ? sys_ioctl+0x4d/0x7b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558629]  [<ffffffff8135cbe9>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558706] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: Xorg/7764
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558755] caller is _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558757] Pid: 7764, comm: Xorg Tainted: P           O 3.9.0-rc6-experimental-amd64 #1
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558759] Call Trace:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558762]  [<ffffffff811a1a11>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc9/0xe0
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558811]  [<ffffffffa189369b>] ? _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558870]  [<ffffffffa13ebbe3>] ? _nv015426rm+0x34/0x17a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558929]  [<ffffffffa13ebd68>] ? _nv015427rm+0x3f/0x78 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558987]  [<ffffffffa13eb46d>] ? _nv015435rm+0x35/0x34e [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559108]  [<ffffffffa16d065f>] ? _nv007827rm+0x5fd/0xb4e [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559250]  [<ffffffffa169fea2>] ? _nv006969rm+0xae2/0xfa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559312]  [<ffffffffa13db32c>] ? _nv000778rm+0x404/0x485 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559372]  [<ffffffffa13cfb17>] ? _nv000699rm+0xa8/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559432]  [<ffffffffa13cfada>] ? _nv000699rm+0x6b/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559485]  [<ffffffffa188ff6d>] ? _nv000790rm+0x4bd/0x9ee [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559535]  [<ffffffffa189940b>] ? rm_ioctl+0x76/0x100 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559582]  [<ffffffffa18b687f>] ? nv_kern_ioctl+0x334/0x39a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559628]  [<ffffffffa18b691b>] ? nv_kern_unlocked_ioctl+0x19/0x1d [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559631]  [<ffffffff810f87c2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x1e/0x31
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559633]  [<ffffffff810f8f9f>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x3b4/0x3f6
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559636]  [<ffffffff810ebb47>] ? fdget+0xe/0x17
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559639]  [<ffffffff810ec2c0>] ? vfs_read+0xac/0xf5
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559642]  [<ffffffff810f902e>] ? sys_ioctl+0x4d/0x7b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559645]  [<ffffffff8135cbe9>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    on kernel 3.8.6 and 3.9-rc6.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    550

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by towo2099 View Post
    For me this driver is not realy good.
    With this driver i have a lot of spam like
    Code:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556429] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: Xorg/7764
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556478] caller is _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556480] Pid: 7764, comm: Xorg Tainted: P           O 3.9.0-rc6-experimental-amd64 #1
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556482] Call Trace:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556485]  [<ffffffff811a1a11>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc9/0xe0
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556534]  [<ffffffffa189369b>] ? _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556593]  [<ffffffffa13ebbe3>] ? _nv015426rm+0x34/0x17a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556652]  [<ffffffffa13ebd68>] ? _nv015427rm+0x3f/0x78 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556710]  [<ffffffffa13ebf70>] ? _nv015422rm+0x49/0x79 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556837]  [<ffffffffa16d0698>] ? _nv007827rm+0x636/0xb4e [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.556963]  [<ffffffffa169fea2>] ? _nv006969rm+0xae2/0xfa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557020]  [<ffffffffa13db32c>] ? _nv000778rm+0x404/0x485 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557086]  [<ffffffffa13cfb17>] ? _nv000699rm+0xa8/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557149]  [<ffffffffa13cfada>] ? _nv000699rm+0x6b/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557204]  [<ffffffffa188ff6d>] ? _nv000790rm+0x4bd/0x9ee [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557256]  [<ffffffffa189940b>] ? rm_ioctl+0x76/0x100 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557303]  [<ffffffffa18b687f>] ? nv_kern_ioctl+0x334/0x39a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557351]  [<ffffffffa18b691b>] ? nv_kern_unlocked_ioctl+0x19/0x1d [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557354]  [<ffffffff810f87c2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x1e/0x31
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557357]  [<ffffffff810f8f9f>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x3b4/0x3f6
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557361]  [<ffffffff810ebb47>] ? fdget+0xe/0x17
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557363]  [<ffffffff810ec2c0>] ? vfs_read+0xac/0xf5
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557367]  [<ffffffff810f902e>] ? sys_ioctl+0x4d/0x7b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557370]  [<ffffffff8135cbe9>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557375] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: Xorg/7764
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557424] caller is _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557427] Pid: 7764, comm: Xorg Tainted: P           O 3.9.0-rc6-experimental-amd64 #1
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557428] Call Trace:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557431]  [<ffffffff811a1a11>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc9/0xe0
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557480]  [<ffffffffa189369b>] ? _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557539]  [<ffffffffa13ebbe3>] ? _nv015426rm+0x34/0x17a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557598]  [<ffffffffa13ebd68>] ? _nv015427rm+0x3f/0x78 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557725]  [<ffffffffa16d1528>] ? _nv013974rm+0x978/0x1960 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557852]  [<ffffffffa16c9696>] ? _nv003406rm+0x47f1/0xb1bd [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.557977]  [<ffffffffa16942bd>] ? _nv006653rm+0x5a/0xa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558025]  [<ffffffffa168bfc0>] ? _nv006968rm+0x1a8/0x1c3 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558238]  [<ffffffffa16a008a>] ? _nv006969rm+0xcca/0xfa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558300]  [<ffffffffa13db32c>] ? _nv000778rm+0x404/0x485 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558361]  [<ffffffffa13cfb17>] ? _nv000699rm+0xa8/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558419]  [<ffffffffa13cfada>] ? _nv000699rm+0x6b/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558471]  [<ffffffffa188ff6d>] ? _nv000790rm+0x4bd/0x9ee [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558520]  [<ffffffffa189940b>] ? rm_ioctl+0x76/0x100 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558567]  [<ffffffffa18b687f>] ? nv_kern_ioctl+0x334/0x39a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558613]  [<ffffffffa18b691b>] ? nv_kern_unlocked_ioctl+0x19/0x1d [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558615]  [<ffffffff810f87c2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x1e/0x31
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558618]  [<ffffffff810f8f9f>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x3b4/0x3f6
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558621]  [<ffffffff810ebb47>] ? fdget+0xe/0x17
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558623]  [<ffffffff810ec2c0>] ? vfs_read+0xac/0xf5
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558626]  [<ffffffff810f902e>] ? sys_ioctl+0x4d/0x7b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558629]  [<ffffffff8135cbe9>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558706] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: Xorg/7764
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558755] caller is _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558757] Pid: 7764, comm: Xorg Tainted: P           O 3.9.0-rc6-experimental-amd64 #1
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558759] Call Trace:
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558762]  [<ffffffff811a1a11>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc9/0xe0
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558811]  [<ffffffffa189369b>] ? _nv012291rm+0x9/0xe [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558870]  [<ffffffffa13ebbe3>] ? _nv015426rm+0x34/0x17a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558929]  [<ffffffffa13ebd68>] ? _nv015427rm+0x3f/0x78 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.558987]  [<ffffffffa13eb46d>] ? _nv015435rm+0x35/0x34e [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559108]  [<ffffffffa16d065f>] ? _nv007827rm+0x5fd/0xb4e [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559250]  [<ffffffffa169fea2>] ? _nv006969rm+0xae2/0xfa5 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559312]  [<ffffffffa13db32c>] ? _nv000778rm+0x404/0x485 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559372]  [<ffffffffa13cfb17>] ? _nv000699rm+0xa8/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559432]  [<ffffffffa13cfada>] ? _nv000699rm+0x6b/0xf9 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559485]  [<ffffffffa188ff6d>] ? _nv000790rm+0x4bd/0x9ee [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559535]  [<ffffffffa189940b>] ? rm_ioctl+0x76/0x100 [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559582]  [<ffffffffa18b687f>] ? nv_kern_ioctl+0x334/0x39a [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559628]  [<ffffffffa18b691b>] ? nv_kern_unlocked_ioctl+0x19/0x1d [nvidia]
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559631]  [<ffffffff810f87c2>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x1e/0x31
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559633]  [<ffffffff810f8f9f>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x3b4/0x3f6
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559636]  [<ffffffff810ebb47>] ? fdget+0xe/0x17
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559639]  [<ffffffff810ec2c0>] ? vfs_read+0xac/0xf5
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559642]  [<ffffffff810f902e>] ? sys_ioctl+0x4d/0x7b
    Apr 10 17:19:28 Defiant kernel: [  949.559645]  [<ffffffff8135cbe9>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    on kernel 3.8.6 and 3.9-rc6.
    Do the crazy logging activities affect normal performance with the driver?

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Since those messages blowing up the logfiles, after a while the desktop does not response anymore.
    So i can't say anything about the performance, i have switched back to 313.30 driver.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonadow View Post
    Do the crazy logging activities affect normal performance with the driver?
    It is a beta

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •