Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: GCC vs. LLVM/Clang On AMD's FX-8350 Vishera

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz View Post
    You'd think they'd classify OpenMP support as high priority?
    It only matters on a handful of apps that most people don't care much about. Winning Phoronix benchmarks is not what should define a high priority item. In the mean time, if GCC provides substantial improvements for a particular app, use it to compile that app. There's no reason to think that you must be forced to use only one compiler or the other. Or do all your development with Clang and final releases with GCC. Whatever works for you.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elanthis View Post
    It only matters on a handful of apps that most people don't care much about. Winning Phoronix benchmarks is not what should define a high priority item. In the mean time, if GCC provides substantial improvements for a particular app, use it to compile that app. There's no reason to think that you must be forced to use only one compiler or the other. Or do all your development with Clang and final releases with GCC. Whatever works for you.
    I see it the other way round: why should you use a compiler which Apple can easily proprietize, if it does not offer a really big advantage over a compiler which is ensured to stay free? Why invest time in proprietizeable tools?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Because this still bugs me (and it was not the first time that I saw tests which were skewed in favor of LLVM) I now blogged about this: http://draketo.de/light/english/free...ng-amd-vishera

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •