Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 124

Thread: Mir's GPLv3 License Is Now Raising Concerns

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,809

    Default Mir's GPLv3 License Is Now Raising Concerns

    Phoronix: Mir's GPLv3 License Is Now Raising Concerns

    Taking a break from blogging about UEFI and Secure Boot, Linux kernel developer Matthew Garrett is now writing about how Canonical's choice of license for their Mir Display Server is a bit scary. It's not the GPLv3 license alone that's raising eyebrows, but the GPLv3 combined with the Ubuntu Contributor's License Agreement that is unfortunate in the mobile space...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM5MjI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    122

    Unhappy grrr

    And the hits just keep on coming. You know, they say when there's no clear option, the best thing is to do nothing. I think I will just sit back with some Popcorn for the next year since it's clear we are not at the end of the street yet.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Well, that much was obvious from day one. And it isnt just a problem with Mir. We've already been through all of this with Nexuiz. I would have thought people would learn their lessens when that mess happened.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,133

    Default "Now" raising concerns?

    I'm pretty sure a lot of people pointed this out the very day Canonical announced Mir, and they've been doing so ever since then.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,498

    Default

    I'd be astonished if they get any vendors to sign up with this thing. And if they do, I'd have to ask what they're smoking.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    396

    Default

    maybe they're trying to avoid fragmentation.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    221

    Default ???

    what the real world problem?

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Mir's GPLv3 License Is Now Raising Concerns

    Taking a break from blogging about UEFI and Secure Boot, Linux kernel developer Matthew Garrett is now writing about how Canonical's choice of license for their Mir Display Server is a bit scary. It's not the GPLv3 license alone that's raising eyebrows, but the GPLv3 combined with the Ubuntu Contributor's License Agreement that is unfortunate in the mobile space...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM5MjI
    ... Now... raising concerns?

    Good hopping hoppy things that hop Michael, where have you been? The CLA has been an issues since the whole #MirGate debacle started. Cases in point:


    The level... of ... lack of attention is astounding. Did you really have your head buried so far up Mark's Ego ya didn't figure out the CLA was kind of an issue till NOW?!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrecorreia View Post
    what the real world problem?
    GPLv3 requires users be able to replace GPLv3 code if they would like... thats an issue on mobile and is considered VERY anti-carrier. If they can get hardware manufacturers on board thats fine, but few carriers will like the idea of their users screwing with the software.

    The CLA is very anti-opensource because it means that if you submit a patch to Unity or Mir that you have to assign copyright to Canonical. Since Canonical is the only copyright holder it means they can release, for example, version 1.6 of Mir, and then make 1.7 and forward closed source. They can never take away the sources for 1.0 -> 1.6, but they can make any future development closed source.

    This is anti-developer because many open source devs will only submit to projects that they know ARE open source and will REMAIN open source, the CLA makes it so it IS open source now... and it MAYBE will be open source in the future.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnc View Post
    I'd be astonished if they get any vendors to sign up with this thing. And if they do, I'd have to ask what they're smoking.
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTM5MTM

    You could ask these large telecoms what they are smoking... But I don't think corporations are as paranoid as those who feel that the existence of a competitor to wayland is the cardinal sin of our age.

    Yet more FUD leveled at Canonical, mere speculation on possible worst case scenarios without any real basis in fact. Yawn. I look forward to running Mir with proprietary driver support soon.

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTM5MjE

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •