Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: Ubuntu Set To Terminate Its Brainstorm Project

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,098

    Default Ubuntu Set To Terminate Its Brainstorm Project

    Phoronix: Ubuntu Set To Terminate Its Brainstorm Project

    Ubuntu Brainstorm served as a way for the Ubuntu community to nominate new ideas for the Linux operating system, comment on these ideas, and vote on the ideas should you find them interesting and worthwhile. However, now it looks like Ubuntu Brainstorm is going to be eliminated...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM3MTM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    116

    Default

    So... does anyone know what features came about as a result of this project?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gigaplex View Post
    So... does anyone know what features came about as a result of this project?
    A very good question.

    Research should be made on what happened in this project and why everyone lost interest. It sounds like ideas were just killed, and everyone called it a day. That was the worst case scenario. In a better case it was just bureaucracy not needed.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moilami View Post
    A very good question.

    Research should be made on what happened in this project and why everyone lost interest. It sounds like ideas were just killed, and everyone called it a day. That was the worst case scenario. In a better case it was just bureaucracy not needed.
    IIRC e.g. the installer starting installation even before user enters all the field data. There are not many. People lost interest because Ubuntu stopped considering the ideas. Go and see for yourself. There are ideas with thousands of votes... not implemented.

    I couldn't even register a year ago, with the admin not responding.

    In any case. QA? It's definitely 'not among the core values of Ubuntu'.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,458

    Default

    Yeah. Who cares if you defeat windows, if you become windows in the process. Not listening to the users is bad business.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,102

    Default

    It was exciting when it was new, and I proposed many ideas with mockups and such.

    But it seems developers didn't have interest, and those who did lost interest.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Yeah. Who cares if you defeat windows, if you become windows in the process. Not listening to the users is bad business.
    It's indicative of the new Ubuntu. Canonical has the reigns tightly in hand and they don't need contributing users anymore. They need uncritical consumers, who ooh and aah at any new shiny thing Canonical tacks onto Ubuntu. Tada, look, shiny.
    You have to consider that Ubuntu has been around for quite a while now, but it failed to take away any real market share from MS and Apple. So apparently a new strategy is needed.
    This isn't about any of those things. This is about that particular site not being very useful. There are better ways to communicate with developers about what features are wanted now from both technical and non-technical users via Launchpad and the Ubuntu Store. Brainstorm served a niche usecase that no longer exists.

    So... does anyone know what features came about as a result of this project?
    IIRC Dell used Brainstorm to develop features for it's Ubuntu based latops, though I don't know any details.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    308

    Exclamation Gnu os

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Ubuntu Brainstorm served as a way for the Ubuntu community to nominate new ideas for the Linux operating system, (...)
    It's not a Linux operating system, it is a GNU operating system with the (monolithic) Linux-Kernel; thus it's called "GNU/Linux".
    Even though I would not consider Ubuntu to be free software at and after all, we shouldn't deny the fact it utilizes a lot of GNU software, rendering it a GNU OS.
    Unless their NiH-syndrome gets bad enough to attempt to replace those tools, this won't change, and even if, in no case it would turn into a Linux operating system.

    I am not a FSF-fanatic, but we should at least give them credit for their hard work. We wouldn't be here today without them.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Breaking news, "Canonical does not want input from users or community members."

    Shocking.

    [/sarc]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frign View Post
    It's not a Linux operating system, it is a GNU operating system with the (monolithic) Linux-Kernel; thus it's called "GNU/Linux".
    Cool story, bro.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •