Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Unity 8, Mir To Be Experimental Choice In Ubuntu 13.10

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,633

    Default Unity 8, Mir To Be Experimental Choice In Ubuntu 13.10

    Phoronix: Unity 8, Mir To Be Experimental Choice In Ubuntu 13.10

    For those Linux enthusiasts wishing to toy with the Mir Display Server and Canonical's next-generation Unity 8 interface, they will be made optionally available for desktop users with the Ubuntu 13.10 release due out in October...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM3MzY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Good, get in the hands of the community for testing is best for the project.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    210

    Default

    At this rate they may be really able to ship on 2014 as they said. Maybe some bugs here and there but thats part of software life-cycle

    Better ship something than never. The only drawback are going to be video drivers, unless you are running with intel video chips you are out of luck.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheOne View Post
    At this rate they may be really able to ship on 2014 as they said. Maybe some bugs here and there but thats part of software life-cycle

    Better ship something than never. The only drawback are going to be video drivers, unless you are running with intel video chips you are out of luck.
    Let's hope that the supposed contacts between ubuntu and nvidia paid off and we'll see support of Mir around time of launch in 2014.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    187

    Default

    Even if it's buggy, it seems like we'll have a lot fewer design bugs than the rest of the stack. Or maybe we're just creating more- we'll see.

    What I'm really interested to see is how traditional apps integrate with the new Unity, and whether the GTK theme will be reworked. I'm guessing the indicators will be the same, but we'll add a global menubar when docked.

    As annoying as it is that everything is becoming so fragmented from a design perspective, it's still pretty amazing how many awesome things are coming from the Linux ecosystem. It makes Windows 8 seem rather boring.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Can they say if Kubuntu/Xubuntu/Lubuntu will exist at 14.04 and how it will be handled? X.org or will they make those workoning on Mir on their own?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    91

    Default

    I will take my hat off if Canonical could pull a working Desktop Ubuntu using Mir in 14.04.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riklaunim View Post
    Can they say if Kubuntu/Xubuntu/Lubuntu will exist at 14.04 and how it will be handled? X.org or will they make those workoning on Mir on their own?
    I think there's some FUD about the impending doom of the various *buntus. Writing distro-specific patches to enable KDE / Xfce / LXDE to run on top of Mir is beyond the resources available to the *buntus, but there are several potential solutions besides that route that should ensure the *buntus continue to survive.

    First, as you yourself point out, the traditional X server should still be available. That's a safe, reliable fallback in case no other alternatives materialize. Next, since everyone is so sure Wayland is going to be ready for desktop computer usage before Mir is, what's to keep Ubuntu from shipping Wayland in its repositories, and therefore making it readily available to the *buntus to build upon? And even if Ubuntu doesn't ship Wayland in the repos, what is there to prohibit the *buntus from packaging it themselves? And finally, there's also the possibility of a Wayland-Mir compatibility layer.

    For a more fun exercise, try to imagine what it will look like if Ubuntu actually ships a desktop-ready Wayland before they ship a desktop-ready Mir. It can happen, completely unintentionally. Ubuntu gets over 90% of its packages from Debian unstable. Since Wayland is ahead of Mir in development already, and since Mir is being targeted towards mobile first, there's a good chance there's going to be a bit of a gap between Wayland's and Mir's general releases for traditional desktop systems. If enough of this gap occurs outside the Debian 8 (Jessie) freeze, there's a good chance an out-of-the-box functional Wayland will get packaged in Debian. What will Ubuntu do when it's time to re-sync with Debian unstable?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    638

    Default Open source is always more interesting to watch (and hack)

    Quote Originally Posted by scionicspectre View Post
    As annoying as it is that everything is becoming so fragmented from a design perspective, it's still pretty amazing how many awesome things are coming from the Linux ecosystem. It makes Windows 8 seem rather boring.
    Ain't that the truth. Hell, that's something I regarded as one of the disadvantages of the proprietary NVIDIA/ATI drivers: you are just a passive end user. With open source, I've watched Radeon framerates in Scorched3d quadruple in a year, part of it from upstream, part from configuring it right. Try THAT with a proprietary driver.

    Windows 8, like GNOME and Ubuntu, has gotten into trouble with the desktop/tablet mismatch. Unlike us, it's "take it or leave it." Here, fragmentation is a nuisance but hardly new. The other side of fragmentation is variety and a smorgasboard of options. If you are working on something and like QT's tools, use them, you won't lock out GNOME users. The reverse is also true. We've lived with the GNOME/KDE divide and you can run anything from either side of the house on the other. That's the one thing we do need to keep, so compatability layers are going to be important. A possible ugliness
    will be that very graphically demanding applications might need to run in their native environment for maximum performance.

    Other than that issue, we are getting a choice of three display servers, at least five "modern" DE's plus dozens of lightweight ones. It should be possible for a distro-or a hacker-to pretty much set up any desired desktop for any class of device. UbuntuStudio (or whatever it evolves into) running
    on a big multicore won't and should not look like Ubuntu Touch running on a smartphone, but the packages will exist to build either, so long as library incompatabilies, etc are carefully avoided.

    I for one am looking forward to Cinnamon,(based on gnome-shell) getting ported to Wayland. Unity on Mir and Gnome-shell and Cinnamon on Wayland might take the "heavy" and the "slow" out of all these DE's once and for all. That will get Linux as a whole past our "Vista Moment."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Serge View Post
    First, as you yourself point out, the traditional X server should still be available. That's a safe, reliable fallback in case no other alternatives materialize. Next, since everyone is so sure Wayland is going to be ready for desktop computer usage before Mir is, what's to keep Ubuntu from shipping Wayland in its repositories, and therefore making it readily available to the *buntus to build upon? And even if Ubuntu doesn't ship Wayland in the repos, what is there to prohibit the *buntus from packaging it themselves?
    There is the question of their graphics stack. It has to support Wayland. If they patch it to only support Mir, then that would require the other *buntu groups to maintain their own stack.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •