Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,555

    Default Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer

    Phoronix: Raspberry Pi Gets New Wayland Weston Renderer

    After working on the Raspberry Pi support for Wayland/Weston, Pekka Paalanen has announced a new "rpi-renderer" for the low-cost ARM development board...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM3NzI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    183

    Default

    The Pi already runs single programs decently without any sort of hardware acceleration. With improvements like these, I wonder how much more viable the Pi would be as a casual multitasking computer?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scionicspectre View Post
    The Pi already runs single programs decently without any sort of hardware acceleration. With improvements like these, I wonder how much more viable the Pi would be as a casual multitasking computer?
    The answer would be still not great..... Its much better as a small server, sensor data collector, or controller for other devices.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scionicspectre View Post
    The Pi already runs single programs decently without any sort of hardware acceleration. With improvements like these, I wonder how much more viable the Pi would be as a casual multitasking computer?
    The Pi still has a slow single core CPU. If it was dual core it would be much better, but the price would also be higher. :/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,253

    Default

    The Pi in general isn't that great of a value anymore. The stupid thing is mostly all you're paying for is parts and manufacturing, considering it's a non-profit project. I feel like the RPi devs would get more success if they charged another $5 or so for a significantly more powerful CPU and more memory. For non-developer purposes, there are better systems for a similar price.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    361

    Default

    The Pi's hardware is outdated, yeah. On the other hand, official support by the foundation and community support is so much better than with any other ARM board. This is often more worth than raw hardware power.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brent View Post
    The Pi's hardware is outdated, yeah. On the other hand, official support by the foundation and community support is so much better than with any other ARM board. This is often more worth than raw hardware power.
    The range of projects and applications due to the community support far out value the processing/$.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    The Pi in general isn't that great of a value anymore. The stupid thing is mostly all you're paying for is parts and manufacturing, considering it's a non-profit project. I feel like the RPi devs would get more success if they charged another $5 or so for a significantly more powerful CPU and more memory. For non-developer purposes, there are better systems for a similar price.
    Agreed, they should do a both a $50 model and a $100 dollar model, more options with better performance would draw in more people. Though I'd love to see them focus more on parts that can get fully OSS drivers.
    Last edited by Kivada; 05-22-2013 at 05:54 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    449

    Default

    I think it's important to remember the intended audience, it's intention is to be an educational device; one that schools can use to teach pupils the basics of programming in Scratch and Python, it was never intended as a general purpose device for ordinary people. Whilst they're happy for that to happen, they won't compromise anything on the educational front in order to make it more appealing as a general-purpose device.

    Pretty much everything about the hardware was focused on getting the costs down, that's why there are 2 USB ports instead of 3, for instance. If they start changing the hardware too much they would need to redesign the board, which wouldn't necessarily be trivial, and they would also need to support a fragmented community, where some programs can only be run on the (theoretical) model C that has a 1.2GHz processor.

    edit: don't get me wrong though, I've love a Pi that had higher specs!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    south east
    Posts
    342

    Default damn Weyland Yutani

    These guys are relentless.
    They've been after the Xenomorphs ever since Alienware got bought out by Dell.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •