Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55

Thread: VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,539

    Default VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome

    Phoronix: VP9 Codec Now Enabled By Default In Chrome

    Google has just enabled their new, royalty-free VP9 video codec within their Chromium / Chrome web-browser...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM5MDU

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    45

    Default

    This is so important for me that I just MUST comment!
    I use WebM, VP8 (the previous version) and if youtube won't play the video for me in WebM in Chromium I just ./youtube-dl -tf it down and then open with Totem/VLC and just enjoy
    VP9 sounds cool. So what version of Chrome/Chromium? Must be dev version, right? Now I use 27.x.(which I got from Alex Shkop's ppa)
    Last edited by powdigsig; 06-17-2013 at 09:52 AM. Reason: Hard to find PPA's that have fairly recent versions of chromium-browser

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    560

    Default

    Good, but we can always hope that codec will be popular... and I doubt it will.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    somewhere at the edge of the Milky Way
    Posts
    98

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by powdigsig View Post
    I use WebM, VP8 (the previous version) and if youtube won't play the video for me in WebM in Chromium I just ./youtube-dl -tf it down and then open with Totem/VLC and just enjoy
    I absolutely hate DRM platforms and that's why I'm doing exactly the same thing. This extension even makes it extremely convenient

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    638

    Default

    i disable vp8 (and any later version) in my browser, because youtube serve only webm if the browser can decode this. On an slow cpu i want to use the gpu decoder, but thats impossible wit vpX.

  6. #6

    Default

    I am curious, has any hardware manufacturer announced to support VP9 using hardware video decoding?
    Otherwise, although interesting, the use of VP9 in practice will surely be as limited as VP8 was.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    523

    Default

    After the whole VP8 vs h264 debate last time, has anyone answered the question "Is VP9 better than h264?"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    560

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [Knuckles] View Post
    After the whole VP8 vs h264 debate last time, has anyone answered the question "Is VP9 better than h264?"
    I'll bet on "No, you are blatantly wrong for saying VP9 is superior to H.264.".

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Calinou View Post
    I'll bet on "No, you are blatantly wrong for saying VP9 is superior to H.264.".
    Who cares as long as it is good enough.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfred View Post
    Who cares as long as it is good enough.
    yeah but is it ? is it at least close the h264? (quality, size, compression speed, decompression speed) =p

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •