Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: 8-Way Desktop Comparison On Ubuntu 13.10 Linux

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,305

    Default 8-Way Desktop Comparison On Ubuntu 13.10 Linux

    Phoronix: 8-Way Desktop Comparison On Ubuntu 13.10 Linux

    Up this Saturday morning on Phoronix are some OpenGL/gaming performance benchmarks of eight different desktop environments currently available from the Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" package archive when using Intel Core i7 "Haswell" graphics with the Linux 3.10 kernel and Mesa 9.2...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTM5MzY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cologne, Germany
    Posts
    308

    Cool Xfce ftw

    I really like setting a Xfce-Desktop up for elderly people, as there are three factors which essentially rule out most other DE's:
    1. It's intuitive. I only need around 10 minutes to explain somebody who has been using Windows for 10 years how Xfce works. It's really handy!
    2. It has a low memory-footprint. It might not be as low as DWM, which I am using, but it is one of the best compared to other "normal" DE's
    3. It's well-extendable. It's really astonishing how great the xfce4-tools are. It is very easy to set a printer up or use ICC-color-correction, because there is only one central way of configuration, which I really like, and the tools are developed in-house.


    Seeing it surpass the other contestants should show us all that benchmarking in one those DE's may be more precise and will definitely yield better results (as shown in the article). Who's with me?
    Last edited by frign; 06-22-2013 at 05:15 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by frign View Post
    I really like setting a Xfce-Desktop up for elderly people, as there are three factors which essentially rule out most other DE's:
    1. It's intuitive. I only need around 10 minutes to explain somebody who has been using Windows for 10 years how Xfce works. It's really handy!
    2. It has a low memory-footprint. It might not be as low as DWM, which I am using, but it is one of the best compared to other "normal" DE's
    3. It's well-extendable. It's really astonishing how great the xfce4-tools are. It is very easy to set a printer up or use ICC-color-correction, because there is only one central way of configuration, which I really like, and the tools are developed in-house.


    Seeing it surpass the other contestants should show us all that benchmarking in one those DE's may be more precise and will definitely yield better results (as shown in the article). Who's with me?
    +1, I think all game benchmarks should be done in a more lightweight DE than Unity (and with comositing off).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    9

    Lightbulb

    It would be nice to see some Enlightenment benchmarks. I wonder how good it is.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    83

    Default

    I guess if no one will say it I will. What in the hell is going on with Gnome and Kde to have this poor performance.Is this some kind of regression or Unity improved allot.Can someone comment on Kde 4.11 if they are running on Kubuntu or Suse.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kUrb1a View Post
    I guess if no one will say it I will. What in the hell is going on with Gnome and Kde to have this poor performance.Is this some kind of regression or Unity improved allot.Can someone comment on Kde 4.11 if they are running on Kubuntu or Suse.

    Unity improved alot. KDE and Shell improved too, just not as much. Maybe Ubuntu listened to the "gasp" users.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    22

    Default

    I wonder how Cinnamon stacks up to standard gnome as it feels like one of the slowest around, personally I have always been using xfce on my laptop as it performs rather well and can be customized a lot.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qlum View Post
    I wonder how Cinnamon stacks up to standard gnome as it feels like one of the slowest around, personally I have always been using xfce on my laptop as it performs rather well and can be customized a lot.
    i want to see Cinnamon Mate and KDE Base

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qlum View Post
    I wonder how Cinnamon stacks up to standard gnome as it feels like one of the slowest around, personally I have always been using xfce on my laptop as it performs rather well and can be customized a lot.
    I doubt there's any difference... Cinnamon and Shell are basically the same codebase. The screen layout and widget interfaces are different, but there's no real difference in the bits that would affect performance...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    117

    Default yes

    Quote Originally Posted by frign View Post
    I really like setting a Xfce-Desktop up for elderly people, as there are three factors which essentially rule out most other DE's:
    1. It's intuitive. I only need around 10 minutes to explain somebody who has been using Windows for 10 years how Xfce works. It's really handy!
    2. It has a low memory-footprint. It might not be as low as DWM, which I am using, but it is one of the best compared to other "normal" DE's
    3. It's well-extendable. It's really astonishing how great the xfce4-tools are. It is very easy to set a printer up or use ICC-color-correction, because there is only one central way of configuration, which I really like, and the tools are developed in-house.


    Seeing it surpass the other contestants should show us all that benchmarking in one those DE's may be more precise and will definitely yield better results (as shown in the article). Who's with me?
    Gosh, I totally agree. It's so darn customizable too, you can rearrange it to your hearts content. And I see a lot of people complain about Gaming issues on KDE/Gnome/Unity obviously related to Compiz etc but in XFCE I have yet to have any issues. I wish more people would use XFCE, especially Linux Gamers. I've got mine set-up in old win98 style with the dock removed and the top bar on the bottom. "Menu-separator(handle)-custom launchers as a quick launch-separator(dots)-window buttons-separator(dots)-network monitor, notification area,weather update-separator(handle)-clock(LCD)"

    It's clean and simple and stays out of my way. Theme: Appearance (Clearlooks) Window manager (Clearlooks-Xfce-Classic). But I usually use: Appearance (Shiki-brave) Window manager (classic-ambiance-orange-xfce-lxde)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •