Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 115

Thread: The First Benchmarks Of Unity On XMir: There's A Performance Hit

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by computerquip View Post
    Considering I've been playing with XWayland since late 2012, why haven't XWayland tests been brought forth?
    If you wanted to say there was a conspiracy you'd say Microsoft is behind Wayland as a means to keep Linux back 10 years.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by computerquip View Post
    Considering I've been playing with XWayland since late 2012, why haven't XWayland tests been brought forth?
    I just tried to run OpenGL apps under xwayland. I could not get them running. glxinfo gives sth like

    Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig

    and glxgear gives

    Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual

    libglx.so seems to be properly loaded from X.org.log

    Will try to file a bug report tomorrow if nothing comes out.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,463

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by e8hffff View Post
    If you wanted to say there was a conspiracy you'd say Microsoft is behind Wayland as a means to keep Linux back 10 years.
    That statement is so stupid it hurts my brain.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Considering how slow the development is it's clear that people have been less than invested in it. Look at how fast Mir gets developed. They announce it. Bam. They release a test version earlier than expected. Bam. Will be default faster than expected. Bam. While Wayland, we've been hearing about it since 2008-2009. Talk about development hell. And Intel who says they work on Wayland is known to be Microsoft's girlfriend. They're not exactly hurrying with the release now are they?



    He'll never admit that Wayland might not be what they said it will be. Right now it looks like a failed project. Too little. Too late.
    Don't feed the troll please. Better to stay with fact and leave @dee doing idiot FUD alone.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,939

    Default

    The problem with these new display servers is not the complexity in writing them. They are designed with the intention of not doing much at all, that is the whole point behind Wayland.

    The difficulty is in coming up with a good protocol that is future-proof and widely agreed upon by the community so it can last a long while. That's one of the reasons why Wayland is taking so long, in addition to the fact that X is good enough (tm) for most people and most applications right now, so there is not much money being pumped into Wayland.

    What Ubuntu did is take Wayland concepts shortly before the Wayland protocol was finalised, add their own changes without consulting anyone, then writing the server in-house (arguably the easiest part of the whole process). The result is a server nobody in the community wants to support, which is exclusive to Ubuntu, and Canonical will have to maintain compatibility patches for all relevant toolkits and libraries.

    I cannot imagine Mir having any impact on the Linux ecosystem at all. Wayland, perhaps.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Not a bad hit for alpha/early software. Color my surprised.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,673

    Default

    Michael, there's a mistake on the 5th page:
    OpenArena 0.8.5, which is a rather CPU-limited game and doesn't even make use of GLSL, saw no performance difference at 800 x 600 but at 1920 x 1080, the old game saw its frame-rate drop by about 25% with going through XMir.
    It's not 1920x1080, it's 1600x900.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    I'm personally not surprised by these results at all - Canonical got a head start since they decided to base this off of Android's code, to some degree anyway. As said before, a compatibility layer will always result in poorer performance, HOWEVER, that means worse performance compared to native. So for example, a game compiled to work for Wayland will perform better than the X version in Xwayland. But, Xwayland could still potentially perform better than X11. But considering how young Mir is, I'm not surprised it performed worse, and its performance loss is far from "what a shame, just kill it".


    At this point I'm finding it a bit tough to figure out which display server will end up being the best replacement to X:
    Pros of Mir over Wayland:
    * MUCH faster development
    * Supposed to get Android driver support
    * A seemingly more devoted team

    Pros way Wayland over Mir:
    * Targets all DEs in mind
    * Seems to be more thought-out in a technical standpoint
    * Better multi-seat support
    * A fully open source license
    * Probably will be more light-weight in the end

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scottishduck View Post
    Again, wrong. No plans for Mir migration until 14.04 at the earliest.
    How is he wrong? It was already posted on Phoronix that Canonical plans to ship with Mir/XMir by default on Ubuntu 13.10.

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag
    Supposed to get Android driver support
    So is Wayland:

    Wayland utilizing Android GPU drivers on glibc based systems, Part 1
    Wayland utilizing Android GPU drivers on glibc based systems, Part 2

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BO$$ View Post
    Considering how slow the development is it's clear that people have been less than invested in it. Look at how fast Mir gets developed. They announce it. Bam. They release a test version earlier than expected. Bam. Will be default faster than expected. Bam. While Wayland, we've been hearing about it since 2008-2009. Talk about development hell.
    Bam. BO$$ post another post in on a subject he obviously knows little about. As already mentioned Mir basically just rips off Waylands design (which is where alot of the time has been spent), and XMir is just the XWayland code ported to Mir. All the mir developers have done is reimplement the wayland design reusing many existing open source components. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with this thats why things are open source but its hardly the triumph you make it out to be. As pointed out the X server has been with us for over 20 years, when you implement something new to replace it you want to get it right the first time as the Wayland team are trying to do not rush something out the door like Ubuntu is doing with Mir.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •