Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Mozilla Firefox 23.0 Now In Beta With New Features

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    465

    Default

    - Mozilla's Social Share API functionality is now exposed to developers.
    Does this mean we are also going to get new html tags instead off custom share panels?
    Hate those custom share panels, the static nature of hard coding social sharing sites is a disaster.
    Would like to have social html tags such as a sharing panel.

    They seem to not have heard of the h-online approach, the Mozilla devs should take an example from this:
    http://www.h-online.com/features/Two...y-1783256.html

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Something to note about the new mixed content blocking:
    it potentially breaks viewing certain sites with addons like HTTPS Everywhere:
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=878890
    They're working on a bugfix, but so far it remains unresolved afaik.

    For those to lazy to follow the link:
    Basically, even if HTTPS Everywhere redirects unsecure elements to their secure counterparts (e.g. makes example.com css loaded from http://example.com/example.css redirect to https://example.com/example.css), Firefox interprets the loaded page as having mixed content, and blocks the redirected elements, probably breaking the page design.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    98

    Default Poor blink

    Why did they kill <blink>? It had never harmed anyone! Well, not more than 3-D clocks with spinning globules following the mouse pointer, or swirling GIF snowflakes eating 75% of the CPU. So why did <blink> get all the hate? What shall we do next, inspect all CSS and remove questionable choices of background and text colour? Suppress the use of fonts of dubious taste? Institute a W3C validator for the fancyness of web pages?

    Poor <blink>, with your untimely passing away, it's an era that comes to an end. I'll miss you.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppepz View Post
    Why did they kill <blink>? It had never harmed anyone! Well, not more than 3-D clocks with spinning globules following the mouse pointer, or swirling GIF snowflakes eating 75% of the CPU. So why did <blink> get all the hate? What shall we do next, inspect all CSS and remove questionable choices of background and text colour? Suppress the use of fonts of dubious taste? Institute a W3C validator for the fancyness of web pages?e

    Poor <blink>, with your untimely passing away, it's an era that comes to an end. I'll miss you.
    And there's no browser out there that still supports it? Firefox is not the only browser around.
    This is an example: lynx browser org, I know nothing other about this browser, than that I have used it a bit when my X.org crashed once for good, and I was like in the dark with a lighted match.
    Last edited by powdigsig; 06-29-2013 at 02:58 AM. Reason: Maybe bad example

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    98

    Default Can't disable JavaScript any more

    On a side note, I just discovered that you can no longer disable JavaScript in Firefox 23. The reason is fear that a stupid user could navigate deeply into the advanced preferences dialog box, disable JavaScript in there, see that the internets are no longer working for him, become more stupid during the process as to not being able to navigate into the preferences dialog box and turn JavaScript on again, and then recover his smartness at least for the time required to file a bug report to Mozilla about the internet being broken.

    A modest proposal to Mozilla: just disable the preferences dialog box, all of it. Advanced users can still manage their preferences through about:config, while non-technical users will be obviously scared away by the disclaimer they get when they try to get in there. You will decrease your support burden this way. Well, possibly your user base too, depending on whether you have more users who like to customise their browsing experience to the point of replacing the built-in browser which was comfortably installed by default on their operating system, or you have more users that disable JavaScript and then submit bug reports.
    </rant>

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    98

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by powdigsig View Post
    And there's no browser out there that still supports it? Firefox is not the only browser around.
    This is an example: lynx browser org
    True, but text-mode browsers will do only as long as XTerm supports blinking text. Right now it does. Unfortunately, the framebuffer console doesn't seem to support it, it will give a bright background instead. I haven't tried if kmscon supports it, I'm not doing it just now because I'm afraid that it could crash my X session.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppepz View Post
    On a side note, I just discovered that you can no longer disable JavaScript in Firefox 23. The reason is fear that a stupid user could navigate deeply into the advanced preferences dialog box, disable JavaScript in there, see that the internets are no longer working for him, become more stupid during the process as to not being able to navigate into the preferences dialog box and turn JavaScript on again, and then recover his smartness at least for the time required to file a bug report to Mozilla about the internet being broken.
    Use noscript. Much more practical then disabling javascript completely.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Firefox 23 with h.264 support on Linux
    Kernel 3.10 with Radeon UVD support
    Kernel 3.11 with Radeon DPM support
    KDE 4.11 with some of the biggest changes (I think) in a long time

    The next 2-3months are gonna be very interesting for the OSS community haha
    I just tried kde 4.11 on a kubuntu 13.10 live usb yesterday. man, on intel hd4000 its night and day. Not only is video tearing finally fixed, but Kwin's performance is massively improved, it was so butter smooth compared to 4.10. I'll probably be switching once 4.11 it comes out.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppepz View Post
    On a side note, I just discovered that you can no longer disable JavaScript in Firefox 23. The reason is fear that a stupid user could navigate deeply into the advanced preferences dialog box, disable JavaScript in there, see that the internets are no longer working for him, become more stupid during the process as to not being able to navigate into the preferences dialog box and turn JavaScript on again, and then recover his smartness at least for the time required to file a bug report to Mozilla about the internet being broken.

    A modest proposal to Mozilla: just disable the preferences dialog box, all of it. Advanced users can still manage their preferences through about:config, while non-technical users will be obviously scared away by the disclaimer they get when they try to get in there. You will decrease your support burden this way. Well, possibly your user base too, depending on whether you have more users who like to customise their browsing experience to the point of replacing the built-in browser which was comfortably installed by default on their operating system, or you have more users that disable JavaScript and then submit bug reports.
    </rant>
    Totally disabling javascript is rather stupid and will break most sites, it makes sense to move a "destructive" action like that to about:config to avoid users accidentally enabling it. They didn't remove anything, they just moved an advanced option to where it belongs.

    I'd recommend using the noscript extension rather than disabling javascript completelty anyway...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Firefox 23 with h.264 support on Linux
    [...]

    What happens to distros which refuse to support proprietary codes and rely on Firefox as default browser?

    so options they might have:
    • abolish their "no proprietary codecs" policy
    • make a exception of the policy or ignore that Firefox 23+ has h264 support
    • remove Firefox from their repository
    • include only a modified version of Firefox 23+ in their repo, which doesn't support h264

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •