Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: AMD Catalyst vs. NVIDIA OpenCL Performance

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,650

    Default AMD Catalyst vs. NVIDIA OpenCL Performance

    Phoronix: AMD Catalyst vs. NVIDIA OpenCL Performance

    In the middle of doing a large AMD/Intel/NVIDIA multi-way closed-source vs. open-source Fedora-based Linux OpenGL performance comparison, I also ran a fresh round of OpenCL benchmarks on the GPUs backed by CL-capable proprietary drivers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQwMDI

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    830

    Default

    Not that surprising. AMD has always been geared a bit more towards GPGPU. That's why people use them for Bitcoin mining.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    Not that surprising. AMD has always been geared a bit more towards GPGPU. That's why people use them for Bitcoin mining.
    Yeah, amd radeons are really popular for that. So perhaps amd delivers a better product than nvidia. I know this is regarded as heresy on these forums, but still.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfred View Post
    Yeah, amd radeons are really popular for that. So perhaps amd delivers a better product than nvidia. I know this is regarded as heresy on these forums, but still.
    Opencl? I only use cuda, for me opencl is irrelevant and the nvidia driver is more fast in games more stable on DE's etc etc etc

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    261

    Default

    no APU again?
    i guess OpenCl will gain in importance once the new kaveri APUs are released with their hUMA memory arch.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pandev92 View Post
    Opencl? I only use cuda, for me opencl is irrelevant and the nvidia driver is more fast in games more stable on DE's etc etc etc
    there are also people that still use cobol, this does not make it look any better.

    opencl's api might be more difficult to learn but it is way better structured and has more potential in gpu than what nvidia is offering.
    also it is oss which makes it more agile to changes and more attractive than closed ones.

    now that opencl is gaining support in big commercial suites like adobe's you can say that it is a matter of time to hear about the death of it, like what happened to physx.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,801

    Default

    The article doesn't mention whether this is doing double precision FP or single precision. This is a glaring omission. Please update the article, as many people care a lot about single precision and it's well known that NVidia cripples double precision FP on their consumer cards. Right now, we don't have a clue what we're actually looking at with those charts.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yorgos View Post
    there are also people that still use cobol, this does not make it look any better.

    opencl's api might be more difficult to learn but it is way better structured and has more potential in gpu than what nvidia is offering.
    also it is oss which makes it more agile to changes and more attractive than closed ones.

    now that opencl is gaining support in big commercial suites like adobe's you can say that it is a matter of time to hear about the death of it, like what happened to physx.
    I got a hearty laugh.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    830

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfred View Post
    Yeah, amd radeons are really popular for that. So perhaps amd delivers a better product than nvidia. I know this is regarded as heresy on these forums, but still.
    People spend money on graphics cards to play games. Only a few people actually care about Bitcoin Mining or Folding@Home etc. Picking a niche application where it performns better and calling it a better product because of that is a bit exaggerated. Let's not forget the better drivers, graphics performance and power consumption NVIDIA has to offer.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,801

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    People spend money on graphics cards to play games.
    It doesn't look any better with DirectCompute either. Games are picking that up now, and AMD outperforms NVidia there too. And I'm not talking silly stuff like "TressFX" hair in Tomb Raider, but rather good stuff like DX11 global illumination, which uses DirectCompute.

    The scale is shifting towards AMD this year. They are now performing better in the latest DX11 games because of superior GPGPU performance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •