Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 50

Thread: AMD Catalyst vs. NVIDIA OpenCL Performance

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    795

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfred View Post
    Yeah, amd radeons are really popular for that. So perhaps amd delivers a better product than nvidia. I know this is regarded as heresy on these forums, but still.
    People spend money on graphics cards to play games. Only a few people actually care about Bitcoin Mining or Folding@Home etc. Picking a niche application where it performns better and calling it a better product because of that is a bit exaggerated. Let's not forget the better drivers, graphics performance and power consumption NVIDIA has to offer.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    People spend money on graphics cards to play games.
    It doesn't look any better with DirectCompute either. Games are picking that up now, and AMD outperforms NVidia there too. And I'm not talking silly stuff like "TressFX" hair in Tomb Raider, but rather good stuff like DX11 global illumination, which uses DirectCompute.

    The scale is shifting towards AMD this year. They are now performing better in the latest DX11 games because of superior GPGPU performance.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    239

    Default

    The larger problem I have is that NVIDIAs blob doesn't support powersave in dual monitor mode.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    It doesn't look any better with DirectCompute either. Games are picking that up now, and AMD outperforms NVidia there too. And I'm not talking silly stuff like "TressFX" hair in Tomb Raider, but rather good stuff like DX11 global illumination, which uses DirectCompute.

    The scale is shifting towards AMD this year. They are now performing better in the latest DX11 games because of superior GPGPU performance.
    If we had better Linux drivers that would be a point.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaodan View Post
    The larger problem I have is that NVIDIAs blob doesn't support powersave in dual monitor mode.
    They do if you have the same resolution and refresh rates, or if you have a Kepler card.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by e8hffff View Post
    I've always been a fan of ATI, but the Nvidia GT660 TI has been a dream with Wine compared to my ATI 3870.
    In this escenary (WINE), NVIDIA kick at nuts ATI/MAD but for now ATI/MAD main problem remains on actual drivers state (ATI/MAD hardware is good) on WINE


  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    484

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnc View Post
    I got a hearty laugh.
    Either you're laughing at him or you don't grasp that CUDA is dying.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    People spend money on graphics cards to play games.[...]
    and more than 97% of these people do not want to play their Windows games under Linux.

    If Nvidia really has a better closedsource driver for Linux than AMD, it doesn't really mean their product is any better than AMD's. Linux is on the desktop computer only a niche plattform after all.

    But I agree that AMD's product isn't better either, only because it is much better with OpenCL performance.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaodan View Post
    If we had better Linux drivers that would be a point.
    I don't know what you are missing from the drivers, but:
    S3 aka suspend to ram works
    gaming works
    opencl is fast.

    What else do you want?

    Oh yes, one company supports opensource development
    One company hinders opensource development

    Pretty much a nobrainer that AMD is the card one should buy.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    I don't know what you are missing from the drivers, but:
    S3 aka suspend to ram works
    gaming works
    opencl is fast.

    What else do you want?

    Oh yes, one company supports opensource development
    One company hinders opensource development

    Pretty much a nobrainer that AMD is the card one should buy.
    Gaming works? Since when? My Radeon HD 7950 still has problems rendering a desktop properly; games on Steam, especially Valve's Source games, are all unplayable with serious glitches; games on Wine have horrible framerates and glitches as well.

    I'm waiting on Catalyst 13.7 to see if there is an improvement.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •