Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: 15-Way Open-Source Intel/AMD/NVIDIA GPU Comparison

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,330

    Default 15-Way Open-Source Intel/AMD/NVIDIA GPU Comparison

    Phoronix: 15-Way Open-Source Intel/AMD/NVIDIA GPU Comparison

    When running Fedora 19 with its updated open-source Linux graphics drivers, 15 different Intel, AMD Radeon, and NVIDIA GeForce GPUs were compared when looking at the open-source Linux OpenGL performance. The tested graphics processors span from the Intel HD Graphics 4600 "Haswell" integrated graphics to the AMD Radeon HD 7950 "Southern Islands" graphics card to the vintage Radeon X1800XL.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18858

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Which hardware and driver combination have the least amount of quirks, glitches, crashes and other stability issues?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    1,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boog View Post
    Which hardware and driver combination have the least amount of quirks, glitches, crashes and other stability issues?
    Likely intel. Radeon at this point is pretty close but still has room for improvement. Haha I remember the days when AMD/ATI was the worst brand to go for, to the point that something like compiz would just give you a white screen. Today the radeon drivers are almost good enough to replace Catalyst.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    Likely intel. Radeon at this point is pretty close but still has room for improvement. Haha I remember the days when AMD/ATI was the worst brand to go for, to the point that something like compiz would just give you a white screen.
    I've been running a 5850 for over a year without a single stability problem. Personally I feel my 2500k graphics colours look slightly washed out compared to that, but stability wise both of them equally "just work". If UVD works on the 6870 then it's probably the best card for a desktop pc, assuming you want to do some gaming.

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    Today the radeon drivers are almost good enough to replace Catalyst.
    I'd like to see the 6870s catalyst FPS because the numbers it's pushing seems to be fairly high.
    Last edited by ownagefool; 07-01-2013 at 03:29 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schmidtbag View Post
    Likely intel. Radeon at this point is pretty close but still has room for improvement. Haha I remember the days when AMD/ATI was the worst brand to go for, to the point that something like compiz would just give you a white screen. Today the radeon drivers are almost good enough to replace Catalyst.
    Except for HD 7xxx cards, apparently. Which kinda shows how difficult it is to right drivers i think. If the architecture is so different from one card to the next that your existing drivers barely function it's no wonder the open-source Nvidia drivers (with now help from Nvidia themselves) are so much worse than the others.

    I really can't wait till the open AMD/Intel drivers are beating the proprietary ones on almost all fronts... hopefully then other corporations will start viewing open-source as a better catalyst (pun intended) to more stable and cross-platform drivers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    645

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F i L View Post
    Except for HD 7xxx cards, apparently. Which kinda shows how difficult it is to right drivers i think. If the architecture is so different from one card to the next that your existing drivers barely function it's no wonder the open-source Nvidia drivers (with now help from Nvidia themselves) are so much worse than the others.

    I really can't wait till the open AMD/Intel drivers are beating the proprietary ones on almost all fronts... hopefully then other corporations will start viewing open-source as a better catalyst (pun intended) to more stable and cross-platform drivers.
    Nouveau drivers do not get ANY help from Nvidia. Its FLOSS driver for Tegra that get some support (limited to 2D/power up).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,988

    Default

    Intel is very stable if you stick to the versions Intel recommends (eg, use Ubuntu). If you deviate, intel starts to be far more unstable than radeon.

    I can only guess that radeon gets testing from a wider base, whereas everyone at the Intel OSTC is forced to upgrade in lockstep :P

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Intel is very stable if you stick to the versions Intel recommends (eg, use Ubuntu). If you deviate, intel starts to be far more unstable than radeon.

    I can only guess that radeon gets testing from a wider base, whereas everyone at the Intel OSTC is forced to upgrade in lockstep :P
    Using Intel on arch right now and it's fine.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    12

    Default

    How suprising, I thought intel was on the top as they embraced free software. By these benchmarks it seems to be more beneficial to purchase an AMD CPU and use its internal graphic processor rather than an Intel CPU, or am I mistaken?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by przemoli View Post
    Nouveau drivers do not get ANY help from Nvidia. Its FLOSS driver for Tegra that get some support (limited to 2D/power up).
    My bad, that was a typo. It should have said "(with no help from nvidia)"... not "(with now help...)".
    I've heard about Nvidia supporting FOSS drivers for Tegra... though idk how long that will last, since they seem to be more and more interested in ARM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •