Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Canonical Announces "Flipped" Ubuntu Touch Images

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,407

    Default Canonical Announces "Flipped" Ubuntu Touch Images

    Phoronix: Canonical Announces "Flipped" Ubuntu Touch Images

    The Ubuntu Touch image model has been flipped around so that Android is no longer on the bottom side and that Ubuntu is going for a different position...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQwMTg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    564

    Default

    What is the difference in terms of usablity/performance/features?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Yo, dawg. I herd you like loading system, so we have Ubuntu Touch where you can load a system while loading a system while loading a system!
    Or something like this...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    46

    Default

    What is the current use of the Android container?
    Will it always be here or is this just temporary while Ubuntu Touch is being developed?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    366

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malizor View Post
    What is the current use of the Android container?
    Will it always be here or is this just temporary while Ubuntu Touch is being developed?
    I think they are still using Android for the display (SurfaceFlinger) until Mir is ready. No idea what the long term plan is, but I suppose they could keep the Android layer around if they want to run Android apps. Which would probably be a good idea, embrace and extend etc.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Interesting.

    Can LXC be used to build something Samsung Knox?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    648

    Default

    if somebody dont understand why they do that, its because they want to use the proprietary drivers from android.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackiwid View Post
    if somebody dont understand why they do that, its because they want to use the proprietary drivers from android.
    Which makes sense given that proprietary X and EGL drivers for phones/tablets are almost non-existent compared to Android drivers. Open-source drivers aren't really up to the task yet either.

    Maybe this will change as Mir, Wayland, Tizen, and Sailfish enter the market environment.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    648

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LLStarks View Post
    Which makes sense given that proprietary X and EGL drivers for phones/tablets are almost non-existent compared to Android drivers. Open-source drivers aren't really up to the task yet either.

    Maybe this will change as Mir, Wayland, Tizen, and Sailfish enter the market environment.
    I have a position about that, but I just want to give that information so other can come to their own judgment. I did not said anything about what I think about that...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LLStarks View Post
    Which makes sense given that proprietary X and EGL drivers for phones/tablets are almost non-existent compared to Android drivers. Open-source drivers aren't really up to the task yet either.

    Maybe this will change as Mir, Wayland, Tizen, and Sailfish enter the market environment.
    A Jolla employee developed a library to load Android drivers with Wayland. Canonical uses the same library for Mir.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •