Have a look at the Lubuntu mailing list. Recently there was a discussion about display servers. One of the Lubuntu devs wrote (and I'm paraphrasing from memory here) that LXDE in a post-X11 world is a question that must be faced at some point. Given that GTK2 will never run natively under Wayland but Qt 5 already does, IMO is the outcome is clear.
Considering it uses a toolkit by Nokia I assume it’s software for Windows Phone 8?
I don't really care too much what the LXDE guys do tbh, as I no longer have any hardware that is slow enough to require using as lightweight a distro (had an old laptop, it got drenched in water... don't ask) so if they want to use Qt, and think it's the best choice for them, good for them. There will still be Xfce and MATE using GTK, though.
Not a high priority? The dev wiki has a roadmap, with the top 3 items beingYes and GTK3 is not a high priority.
It's third on the list, seems like quite a high priority to me (there's over 10 other items below it on the list). GTK3 support is planned for 3.0, which will be the version after the next version (2.10). And the porting is already in progress, there's already a GTK3-branch of GIMP in the git tree. I think it's more likely that GIMP is such a large project (relative to the available manpower) that they have to look at what is feasible with the resources, porting to GTK3 is a big undertaking and takes lots of work. I think the GIMP devs just want to get the GTK3 port done by the time Wayland migration starts, so that GIMP can run on Wayland natively.Support layer masks on layer groups
Cleanup libgimp (including major changes to plugin registration API, work in progress)
Port to GTK3
ok some clear facts
1.) Qt agreement is not affected by Wayland or Mir [lawyer certified]
2.) Qt coding process is 100% done by qtproject.org[i mean 100% like 100%], then once a release is tagged[again by qtproject.org and subsystem maintainers] the code is still 100% in qtproject.org, so 1 week before release digia clone the branch and [in some cases] fast lane patches[from qtproject.org] to their release branch to add or restore features needed for the pay customers[mostly is deprecated features in the OSS version that a big fat paying client require for ABI compatibility]
3.) there is only 2 or 3 exceptions like Qt for VxWorks[this OS forbid opencode] and other uber closed plataforms that nobody cared what happens to it.
4.) all the code already present in qtproject.org is not affected by this because you cannot re license the lgpl code, this is for every new code that digia/community generate binded by those conditions until it reach the lgpl status, digia can copy the code and add a second license but never can scrap the lgpl one[that is why is called dual license and not merged license]
5.) this means that all the windows/mac/android/ios/X11/wayland support already in the qtproject.org repository will stay there for the eternity and lgpl
6.) this agreement basically said if digia release the closed license version of qt[except the one i mentioned before] with an additional feature there have to be a patch in qtproject.org in lgpl form or we fork this crap and middle finger for you[that again digia won't do, is a business suicide]
7.) this free qt for x11 thing is tackling the doubts about maintain control of previous qt version [qt3/2/1], so if eventually that code need to be touched again will be binded by the same conditions[ free qt for x11 is how it was done in trolltech times, where you had separeted codebases this is no longer happening beyond compilation process this days]
quoted wrong post
Last edited by jrch2k8; 07-04-2013 at 11:59 AM.
Sorry, but you have just disqualified yourself from any serious discussion about this topic.