Your complaints I agree with, but we were discussing the memory part, so I don't get your jump to everything else suddenly.
Now, even if we are looking at mobile parts, the AMD A10-5745m and A10-4655m are both 25w parts. AMD always overstates their TDP requirements as they go for theoretical maximum.
Your point is moot.
Last edited by Kivada; 07-08-2013 at 04:52 PM.
According to that you see increasingly diminishing returns as the memory clocks increase to the point where a 12% clock increase results in a 3% to 6% fps change for the A10-5800K, whereas going from ddr-1333 to 1600 followed bandwidth almost exactly.
Assuming a similar core design, I would expect similar diminishing returns.
As for cost, I'm not going to argue over much other than to say I'd expect the 4850HQ (http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/i...50hq-tested/19) to perform very nearly the same as the $200 more 4950HQ since the gpu clocks are identical and the cpu clocks only differ by 100MHz. That's a much better proposition, but, as you say, you very well might be able to find a cheaper system but it's openCL seems quite a bit better than even the nvidia 640 (http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/i...50hq-tested/17).
Looks like you already found the cheaper iris pro, and someone also mentioned the power issue that discrete cards can't ever match.
Last edited by liam; 07-08-2013 at 09:01 PM.
And those parts are both slower. Like i said, it's a trade off based on what is most important to you.Now, even if we are looking at mobile parts, the AMD A10-5745m and A10-4655m are both 25w parts. AMD always overstates their TDP requirements as they go for theoretical maximum.
What point? That different people value different features?Your point is moot.