Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 57

Thread: Canonical Posts X.Org, Driver Patches For XMir

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    ...
    Which in current case, nobody seems to be wanting to support except for Canonical. Ball = dropped.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,121

    Default

    just to clarify AUR stands as Arch Linux User Repository and is not related or supported officially by Arch Linux.

    more plain, Arch don't support Unity or Mir at all and never did, there are just User Made packages for it in AUR.

    quote from faq https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php..._is_the_AUR.3F

    "The AUR (Arch User Repository) is a place where the Arch Linux community can upload PKGBUILDs of applications, libraries, etc., and share them with the entire community. Fellow users can then vote for their favorites to be moved into the [community] repository to be shared with Arch Linux users in binary form."

    "The Arch User Repository is where all PKGBUILDs that users submit are stored, and must be built manually with makepkg. When PKGBUILDs receive enough community interest and the support of a TU, they are moved into the [community] repository (maintained by the TUs), where the binary packages can be installed with pacman."

    "A TU (Trusted User) is a person who is chosen to oversee AUR and the [community] repository. They are the ones who maintain popular PKGBUILDs in [community], and overall keep the AUR running."

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    343

    Default

    so much ubuntu/canonical haters.. go get life...

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NomadDemon View Post
    so much ubuntu/canonical haters.. go get life...
    so much ubuntu/canonical fanbois.. go get life... <-- fixed

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    343

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jrch2k8 View Post
    so much ubuntu/canonical fanbois.. go get life... <-- fixed
    moron....
    iam not ubuntu user. so gtfo bitching idiot. only think you know how to do is to bitch about everything. every post about canonical is "omg canonical bad!!! bad!!!! kill canonical, ubuntu for noobs OMG OMG111111!!!!!"

    bunch of dicks...

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NomadDemon View Post
    moron....
    iam not ubuntu user. so gtfo bitching idiot. only think you know how to do is to bitch about everything. every post about canonical is "omg canonical bad!!! bad!!!! kill canonical, ubuntu for noobs OMG OMG111111!!!!!"

    bunch of dicks...
    Keep it civil Nomad, you two jrch, or be reported.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Distro-specific doesnt mean other distros CANT use it, it means other distros DONT use it. So until another big name distro steps up and says "We support this too, and we will help with maintenance" its distro-specific. Which seems like a chicken-egg problem, because other distros wont use it until its mainlined and it wont be mainlined until other distros use it, but thats kind of the point: if a project wants to make traction the distros need to step up and proactively show "We like this project! We want it to succeed! We will HELP it succeed!"
    Exactly right. Except, that most of the distros cannot really choose which they support, because they simply choose a desktop environment, and then go by whatever options that DE supports. You could argue that some distros pretty much run the development of certain DE's (eg. RHEL/Fedora = GNOME, Mint = Cinnamon/MATE), but that only applies to a small minority of distros. So first of all, there would need to be support for Mir in some DE that some distro is interested in providing.

    So far, the only DE that is interested in offering support for Mir is Unity. Everyone else is going for Wayland. And since no other distro is offering Unity (because it's pretty much a Canonical-only solution, it's very hard if not impossible to even get running in a non-Ubuntu distro), no distro really has any reason to offer Mir at this point, unless they'd want to run a DE on top of XMir which, again, only an idiot would want to do.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pajn View Post
    Mir isn't distro specific. Any distro can use it.
    There have been developers interested in running it on Arch for example (not as an official default but in AUR).
    There are also Unity packages in AUR, but neither Unity or Mir are officially supported by Arch devs or TUs. No wonder, considering that you have to patch half of your userland libs to get Unity going, and Mir is shaping up to be the same sort of nightmare if these patches get rejected.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ericg View Post
    Distro-specific doesnt mean other distros CANT use it, it means other distros DONT use it. So until another big name distro steps up and says "We support this too, and we will help with maintenance" its distro-specific. Which seems like a chicken-egg problem, because other distros wont use it until its mainlined and it wont be mainlined until other distros use it, but thats kind of the point: if a project wants to make traction the distros need to step up and proactively show "We like this project! We want it to succeed! We will HELP it succeed!"
    With that logic Wayland is distro specific for Rebecca Black Linux and that is just stupid.

    There are also Unity packages in AUR, but neither Unity or Mir are officially supported by Arch devs or TUs. No wonder, considering that you have to patch half of your userland libs to get Unity going, and Mir is shaping up to be the same sort of nightmare if these patches get rejected.
    Of course that was what I said (non official).
    Rejecting this patches would probably make Mir distro-specific yes, that's why it's so
    stupid too do so just because your mad at Canonical. Everyone would gain to atleast
    be able to run Mir. Maybe Mir sometimes in the future adds a cool feature that Wayland
    doesn't want because the API wouldn't be clean enough or something like that. Then
    maybe some users would like to run Mir on another distro.

    No one gets hurt if Mir is easily runnable on Fedora or something else.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,096

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pajn View Post
    With that logic Wayland is distro specific for Rebecca Black Linux and that is just stupid.
    And if none of the other distros had plans to change that, it would be correct. The point is that all the major distros (sans Ubuntu) have added Wayland into their plans. Mir hasn't been added to anyone's plans except Canonicals.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •