Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Fedora 20 To Move Towards Journal, GNOME 3.10

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,381

    Default Fedora 20 To Move Towards Journal, GNOME 3.10

    Phoronix: Fedora 20 To Move Towards Journal, GNOME 3.10

    Following the weekly Fedora Engineering and Steering Committee meeting, another large batch of Fedora 20 features were approved. This includes a ruling on the controversial syslog migration to systemd's journal, upgrading the desktop environments, and other proposed work for the F20 development cycle...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQyMDM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    56

    Default lvm not regarded as outdated

    Bad signal for Btrfs enthusiasts:
    Fedora will provide rollback using the old Lvm
    where Btrfs was created for ....
    Or is it just to complete a software before to retire it?
    Last edited by ulenrich; 07-25-2013 at 05:28 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,919

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ulenrich View Post
    Bad signal for Btrfs enthusiasts:
    Fedora will provide rollback using the old Lvm
    where Btrfs was created for ....
    Or is it just to complete a software before to retire it?
    LVM works on any filesystem (you could do BTRFS atop LVM if you really wanted to..) BTRFS Rollback only works on BTRFS, and there's a yum plugin for that too.

    Its not a bad sign, its just a thing thats happened.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ulenrich View Post
    Bad signal for Btrfs enthusiasts:
    Fedora will provide rollback using the old Lvm
    where Btrfs was created for ....
    Or is it just to complete a software before to retire it?
    Doesn't really mean any such thing... LVM is what Redhat/Fedora have been using for volume management for many years. Most likely, this just reflects that it was easier to work the rollback functionality into their existing system, and rip the whole thing out and replace it with a new filesystem that's arguably still not ready for production use...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    715

    Default

    i been waiting to see if this get's some nice update going to Xwayland

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    144

    Thumbs up

    No more syslogd? @core is sounding better and better by the minute. A shame it's still RPMs and not some modern packaging.
    Now that the installer was getting some work done and most everything else in the base system is systemd, an editor, and a few gnu and bash shell binaries, I really had my hopes up for Red Hat to get their act together and pick something like GNU Guix instead.

    Anyhow, does having E17 packages means an Enlightenment spin? That would be pretty awesome :P
    Last edited by c117152; 07-25-2013 at 08:22 PM. Reason: typos. oh God so many... And proofing...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •