Page 11 of 23 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 224

Thread: What Linux Distribution Should Be Benchmarked The Most?

  1. #101
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default openSUSE

    For my 2 cents I would say openSUSE. There is a tumbleweed repository for latest official kernels and libraries if wished, has a great build service and is desktop indifferent.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    88

    Default

    Would love to see more frequent benchmarking of Debian GNU/Linux, especially as Ubuntu diverges further from it, making for interesting comparison.

    The stable/wheezy release is of course covered already. So I'd suggest a test system installed with testing/jessie and kept up-to-date with new features going in.

    From time to time, specific tests could look at interesting stuff picked from unstable or non-free. Maybe APT pinning makes for an easy way to do that. With some aptitude tricks it is probably easy to undo this and return to a pristine testing/jessie system.

    There is full flexibility of desktop environment in Debian, unlike some distros which focus on only one of them. Very easy setup of Xen/KVM allows for testing those vs. bare metal performance on the same installed system. All in all, a very versatile test system, which might only need to be installed once.

  3. #103

    Default

    LFS (Linux from scratch)

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dh04000 View Post
    Uhhhhh.... No. Check Steam for Linux. Check internet traffic sites. They tell a different tune.
    Those numbers are worthless and anyone who uses them as a basis for any sort of argument is either ignorant, or intentionally trying to mislead (ie. a liar).

    Internet traffic sites, like netapplications and the like, only measure page hits from the pages of their few partner companies who participate in the program. That already gives a very biased sampling, concentrating too much on businesses and too little to home users (and ignoring countries outside Europe/USA pretty much completely). But to top that off, their methodology is flawed, with things like multiple users behind a NAT counted as a single user, and inaccuracies in detecting which OS is used.

    Counting methods that identify by browser user agent are extra worthless, as many versions of Mint have the user agent set to report Ubuntu by default - thus resulting in many Mint installations being counted as Ubuntu.

    Fact is that there is no reliable way to measure distro popularity. We can get ballpark figures, but nothing accurate.

  5. #105

    Default

    Here's what you said, Michael:

    Fedora (Core) was my personal favorite.....
    with Mandrake......
    I also really like Xubuntu.....
    stints with Manjaro Linux, the defunct KateOS, Knoppix, openSUSE, CentOS....
    So then here are my nominations for you Michael, in this order:

    You should benchmark with (1)Fedora, (2)Mandrake(Now Mageia?), (3) Xubuntu, (4) Manjaro, (5)Knoppix, (6)OpenSuse, or (7)CentOS.

    I realize Ubuntu's popularity so naturally you will have it around frequently. But you gotta stop making it your non-stop first-stop. This:

    As Ubuntu deviates more and more from the "conventional desktop Linux" stack
    This ^

    We should not celebrate nor hold up walled gardens. We should discourage them.

    Otherwise, if you want to have more walled gardens around here then you should benchmark Android alongside Ubuntu.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    66

    Question Please no more Ubuntu.

    I know that ubuntu is the most used (30 millions of users) and i don't know which other distro recommend to the noobs. But Ubuntu don't have to be more considered a genuine linux distro. Canonical has broke the rules there must be consequences. Cannot recommend Ubuntu derived (Mint, Xubuntu, etc) because are still ubuntu. Maybe should search for another debian derived, like Linux Mint Debian Edition or something.
    Last edited by felipe; 07-26-2013 at 10:12 AM. Reason: what for which

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Ubuntu. Because it is still the most user friendly(out of box) and popular distribution.

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    163

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by felipe View Post
    But Ubuntu don't have to be more considered a genuine linux distro.
    You are raising an interesting point. Where does a "genuine" Linux distribution start and where does it end?

    Is android-x86 a genuine Linux Distribution? After all it ships Linux and has a "desktop" environment.
    Is openelec a genuine Linux Distribution? Altough it does not have a real desktop.
    Is Rebecca Black a genuine Linux Distribution? It's the only one shipping Wayland.
    Is OpenWRT a genuine Linux Distribution? It does not have a desktop at all.
    Are all these rescue systems out there "genuine" Linux distributions?

    So what makes a "genuine" Linux Distribution? The desktop environment? The display server?

    Obviously the kernel is one hard criteria. But the rest?


    Quote Originally Posted by felipe View Post
    Canonical has broke the rules there must be consequences.
    That's just childish. Which rules are you talking about?

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Temar View Post
    You are raising an interesting point. Where does a "genuine" Linux distribution start and where does it end?

    Is android-x86 a genuine Linux Distribution? After all it ships Linux and has a "desktop" environment.
    Is openelec a genuine Linux Distribution? Altough it does not have a real desktop.
    Is Rebecca Black a genuine Linux Distribution? It's the only one shipping Wayland.
    Is OpenWRT a genuine Linux Distribution? It does not have a desktop at all.
    Are all these rescue systems out there "genuine" Linux distributions?

    So what makes a "genuine" Linux Distribution? The desktop environment? The display server?

    Obviously the kernel is one hard criteria. But the rest?




    That's just childish. Which rules are you talking about?
    Everone is talking about Linux "shoulds"-"rules"-"preconditions" like its their property. I'm sorry to inform you that LINUS TORVALDS is PROUD of Android and he is using CHROMEBOOK!

    Some already stated that Ubuntu and Android don't belong to Linux. Pathetic haters.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    282

    Default

    I think OpenSUSE is the best choice. It follows the standards agreed upon by almost all non-Ubuntu distros. Systemd, equal focus on KDE and Gnome, planning on Wayland. It has the OBS that function pretty much like Ubuntus PPA.
    Personally I use Manjaro Linux at the moment, which a quick and easy way to get Arch up and going. Also a good choice.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •