Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51

Thread: NVIDIA's Linux Driver On Ubuntu Is Very Competitive With Windows 8

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kokoko3k View Post
    It is not clear to me.
    did the nouveau driver reclocked the 9800gtx to the max before running benchmark or not?
    Good question, the 9800 performance was not so far behind. AFAIK this is just a reclocking issue like the ATI drivers where it gets fixed and performance suddenly jumps.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    380

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisb View Post
    Good question, the 9800 performance was not so far behind. AFAIK this is just a reclocking issue like the ATI drivers where it gets fixed and performance suddenly jumps.
    I doubt it's 'just a reclocking issue' considering a lot of benchmarks flat out failed to perform on the opensource driver.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    64

    Default

    As someone who is more interested in stability than performance, my next hardware is not going to be nVidia.
    I prefer the open source drivers - and Intel/AMD are making a killing with this regard.

    In fact, there is no need to compromise. With Intel and AMD I get good performance as well while using the open source drivers.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    485

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppercats View Post
    I doubt it's 'just a reclocking issue' considering a lot of benchmarks flat out failed to perform on the opensource driver.
    Yes but aren't those just regressions that will get fixed before release? Whereas the reclocking issue is one of missing functionality.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amehaye View Post
    As someone who is more interested in stability than performance, my next hardware is not going to be nVidia.
    I prefer the open source drivers - and Intel/AMD are making a killing with this regard.

    In fact, there is no need to compromise. With Intel and AMD I get good performance as well while using the open source drivers.
    AMD still isn't good if you need performance on Linux. Nowadays, I'd go for Intel Haswell with integrated GPU

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by plantroon View Post
    AMD still isn't good if you need performance on Linux. Nowadays, I'd go for Intel Haswell with integrated GPU
    Then he has to wait for iris pro.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    295

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackout23 View Post
    I simply don't understand why AMD can't deliver closed drivers that are almost as good as the Windows ones. What's so hard? What does NVIDIA do differently?
    I have an amd card and have been wondering the same.
    But he latest opengl 4.3 beta driver gave me hudge performance boost in Serious Sam 3.
    ( and solved all graphical issues )

    Before this drivers I had to lower the resolution, in this game.

    I did not run any benchmarks, so I cant tell how close they come to directX on windows, but because the difference is so big, I do not need a benchmark to tell its a big step forward.

    No performance boost on Left For Dead 2 though.

    So at the moment I think nvidia still to be the better choice, but at least amd seems to catch up.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    298

    Default

    NVIDIA has the best Linux drivers, but AMD has the best gfx cards in terms of price and OpenCL performance. AMD has good drivers on Windows though.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    831

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wargames View Post
    NVIDIA has the best Linux drivers, but AMD has the best gfx cards in terms of price and OpenCL performance. AMD has good drivers on Windows though.
    I'm member of a pc gaming hardware forum and people aren't actually to exited about AMD Windows drivers either.

    I did not run any benchmarks, so I cant tell how close they come to directX on windows, but because the difference is so big, I do not need a benchmark to tell its a big step forward.
    OpenGL on Windows for SS3 will be slower than Direct3D on Windows. It just has something to do with the Engine. OpenGL performance in SS3 is the same for me with Windows and Linux and NVIDIA.
    Last edited by blackout23; 07-30-2013 at 08:16 AM.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    43

    Default

    I remember Phoronix benchmarked FreeBSD 8.2 versus Linux two years ago where the former came out on top. I wonder how it fairs in the mix today?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •