Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Thread: IBM Opens Up POWER Architecture For Licensing

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,108

    Default IBM Opens Up POWER Architecture For Licensing

    Phoronix: IBM Opens Up POWER Architecture For Licensing

    IBM is now following in the steps of ARM Holdings and has decided to allow for licensing of their CPU architecture. IBM and a group of other companies wanting a stake in IBM's POWER architecture have also founded the OpenPOWER Consortium group...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQzMDM

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,185

    Default

    This has so much potential. Looking forward to the new hw.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    very nice indeed, those IBM power system are performance monsters. i doubt those would be cheap enough to compete with intel tho

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    422

    Default

    About damn time. When Ubuntu dropped PowerPc, you know IBM had to do this.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dukenukemx View Post
    About damn time. When Ubuntu dropped PowerPc, you know IBM had to do this.
    I think you overestimate Ubuntu's importance. My bet's on consoles made this happen. (I.e was the last straw.)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,103

    Default

    They should have done this 10-20 years ago.
    Now it is too late with Intel having almost total dominance, and ARM growing and into the server market now too.

    By the way, didn't they already do this long time ago?
    Wasn't the Power Architecture already opened and licensable a long time ago? http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/power/newto/#2
    Wasn't the firmware already open source long time? Open Firmware, SmartFirmware, SLOF are all open source already.

    What do they really mean?
    I thought this was already done long time ago...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    This has so much potential. Looking forward to the new hw.
    HW has potential when the end user can use it easily (hit power button and do stuff you want). I don't expect it to take over x86 as i don't expect ARM to do that for general computing. Unless of course there is a company that is willing to make this happen.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    62

    Default

    interesting decision. ARM are going to take quite a chunk of the server cpu market over the coming years, ibm won't be in the new gen of consoles except the wii u so ibm's sales of cpu's are going to wear away over time. I hope Nvidia makes their own desktop/laptop SoC using power+nvidia gpu and the rest that goes into a soc. They could sell chips for desktops and laptops running linux/chrome os for a fairly low price yet the performance will be great.

    Does anyone know what the power comsumption levels are on modern ibm architectures? Could they create an apu with the power of an intel core i3 using say 35w? It is a shame windows doesn't support power architecture otherwise we could have a proper competitor to intel and amd.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hajj_3 View Post
    interesting decision. ARM are going to take quite a chunk of the server cpu market over the coming years, ibm won't be in the new gen of consoles except the wii u so ibm's sales of cpu's are going to wear away over time. I hope Nvidia makes their own desktop/laptop SoC using power+nvidia gpu and the rest that goes into a soc. They could sell chips for desktops and laptops running linux/chrome os for a fairly low price yet the performance will be great.

    Does anyone know what the power comsumption levels are on modern ibm architectures? Could they create an apu with the power of an intel core i3 using say 35w? It is a shame windows doesn't support power architecture otherwise we could have a proper competitor to intel and amd.
    The most eficient supercomputers are the BlueGen (uses powerpc), way better than x86. Beside that power is a very mature architecture; in power7 there's 4 threads in each physical core. Another advantage is that power has much higher performance in calculations than x86.
    I think that power is cheaper to produce; you need way less transistors and we all know that x86 now is a mess.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Ive read these guerilla marketeers claims but im still sceptical. Can anyone back up Power superiority up with some cold hard benchmarks or links?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •