Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Elementary OS Releases "Luna" Ubuntu Platform

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Hell, I donated 10USD. Well deserved for making the most attractive desktop distro.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunshine State
    Posts
    308

    Default

    Great looking OS! I'm hoping Pantheon DE hits the main Arch repos sometime soon.

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreckr View Post
    "There really aren't as many technical innovations in the distribution as they are just seeking about beautifying the end-user interfaces."

    This sentence is so wrong that it's funny. Really good HCI is definitely technical innovation, even more so when we are talking about Linux distros.
    I couldn't agree more. Michael: you're great at benchmarking. No need to show off your ignorance in other matters. The Elementary team is all about usability, not "beauty". Of course, beauty comes as a result, but they're not especially original in their beauty aspects. They are, indeed, when it comes to coherence and consistency.

    EDIT: And btw, this is not their final release of Luna, but its Beta 2. It's right there, at the post you link. You have a long way in front of you to become a journalist...

    EDIT2: Actually, it's the final release, but your link to the blog is wrong. Here's the right link: http://elementaryos.org/journal/the-road-to-luna
    Last edited by Aleve Sicofante; 08-12-2013 at 10:47 AM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    25

    Default

    I'm glad there are people in the Linux world who care about interaction design.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    62

    Default

    I use elementary OS/Desktop since before beta 1 and it is just beautiful to look at and beautiful to use. Really, really like it

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    27

    Default

    They should move away from Ubuntu with all that Mir/Qt stuff.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    230

    Default

    I've been amazed for a little while now, using Elementary, that an Ubuntu based distro could be so darn snappy and feel so lightweight.

    They really did do a good job under the hood.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brk0_0 View Post
    They should move away from Ubuntu with all that Mir/Qt stuff.
    One of the developers said on the HN thread that transitioning to XMir in the near future was on the agenda, though they haven't ruled out Wayland either.
    He also said that since they have such a heavy reliance on Launchpad and other Canonical services that moving to another distro e.g. Debian is out of the question in the near term.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intellivision View Post
    One of the developers said on the HN thread that transitioning to XMir in the near future was on the agenda, though they haven't ruled out Wayland either.
    He also said that since they have such a heavy reliance on Launchpad and other Canonical services that moving to another distro e.g. Debian is out of the question in the near term.
    They should not rely on 2 layers of development to get upstream. There is Ubuntu, that gets packages from Debian (mainly), that gets packages from upstream.
    Ubuntu already showed everybody that it doesn't give a shit to versions based on it. Kubuntu, Lubuntu, etc. are not very happy with them.

    Fedora Project is a much more reliable way to get upstream packages, very bleeding edge. If they need something more stable they should move (fast) to Debian. The final result is that their packages should be based on upstream projects like GNOME, not a always-changing distro like Ubuntu. Mint already made a movement that way with LMDE.

    The products from canonical are as volatile as their decisions. =s
    Not solid like Debian or other projects.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    27

    Default

    They should not rely on 2 layers of development to get upstream. There is Ubuntu, that gets packages from Debian (mainly), that gets packages from upstream.
    Ubuntu already showed everybody that it doesn't give a shit to versions based on it. Kubuntu, Lubuntu, etc. are not very happy with them.

    Fedora Project is a much more reliable way to get upstream packages, very bleeding edge. If they need something more stable they should move (fast) to Debian. The final result is that their packages should be based on upstream projects like GNOME, not a always-changing distro like Ubuntu. Mint already made a movement that way with LMDE.

    The products from canonical are as volatile as their decisions. =s
    Not solid like Debian or other projects.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •