Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: X.Org 7.8 Isn't Actively Being Pursued

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,371

    Default X.Org 7.8 Isn't Actively Being Pursued

    Phoronix: X.Org 7.8 Isn't Actively Being Pursued

    While there's an X.Org 7.8 Wiki page that mentions planned features like XWayland integration and video driver hot-plugging, there isn't active work towards putting out the X.Org 7.8 katamari nor specifically on delivering these mentioned features...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQzMzU

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    172

    Default

    Glad to hear it, the sooner I can have a Linux system with no Xorg at all the better. It's entirely correct that the lion's share of effort goes into Wayland and the surrounding ecosystem required to get Wayland working.

    Working on Xorg now would be like rearranging the layout of the deck chairs on the Titanic. All we need is the required XWayland support, and any serious bugfixes. Not new features. Thus begins the long-awaited X voyage into legacy status.

    This policy seems entirely sensible to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    351

    Default

    that depends on how long it would take for everyone to port their stuff to gtk3 or qt5. my estimation is that it would years upon years. and that means having a crappy x stack running inside wayland or making x better.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    238

    Default

    Apps like Firefox and Libre/Open Office will be a problem as firefox still uses GTK2 on LInux and as VCL isn't wayland ready.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaodan View Post
    Apps like Firefox and Libre/Open Office will be a problem as firefox still uses GTK2 on LInux and as VCL isn't wayland ready.
    does the linux version of vlc use qt4?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    79

    Default

    For those who didn't read or didn't understand the article, work continues on the individual X modules from X.Org, including the upcoming Xorg server 1.15 release and the actively maintained drivers. There's just no one who is actively working on the "katamari" releases to roll them all up into one unified set, since so few people use those instead of the individual module releases. (It's not a policy decision as much as a lack of volunteers. Even before I stepped down from the release manager role they'd been coming farther and farther apart, with little complaint.)

    And while all Linux users may need is Xwayland and the X libraries needed for legacy clients to talk to it, X has always been cross-platform, and non-Linux users will be using the rest of X11 for a while still.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaodan View Post
    Apps like Firefox and Libre/Open Office will be a problem as firefox still uses GTK2 on LInux and as VCL isn't wayland ready.
    So QupZilla and Calligra will be happy about this.

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    does the linux version of vlc use qt4?
    VCL, not VLC. VLC is the toolkit used by LibreOffice and OpenOffice.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    that depends on how long it would take for everyone to port their stuff to gtk3 or qt5. my estimation is that it would years upon years. and that means having a crappy x stack running inside wayland or making x better.
    I'm only using KDE applications, Steam and Firefox. KDE should run perfectly fine without X in upcoming months. When comes to Firefox I can give up on it and switch to some Qt5 based browser. An only problem will be with steam, but rather than running entire X, using xwayland seems to be a way smarter idea.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pawlerson View Post
    KDE should run perfectly fine without X in upcoming months. .
    how so. they would have to port everything to qt5, which will take years. until then its xwayland.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    843

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garegin View Post
    how so. they would have to port everything to qt5, which will take years. until then its xwayland.
    No... No they won't take years and years, unlike the Qt3->Qt4 switchover Qt5 is mostly source compatible with Qt4, and there's plenty of instances where to port you only need to recompile the code to make it use Qt5. The real issue and work is KF5 because a lot of the KDE libraries are/have been merged into Qt5, and KDE applications need a KF5 release unless they want to port to using pure Qt (which would be a lot of work), before they can go to using Qt5. So no Qt5 is not the porting issue, KF5 is, but I don't really expect it'll take that long for everything to port a year or two max once KF5 is released, for applications that are waiting until a release to start that work.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •