Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Ubuntu Will Stick With Firefox Over Chromium For Now

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz View Post
    Firefox on mobile is quite good... can't that be used?
    The Firefox *browser* is good, but the rendering engine isn't very convenient as a component for other apps (which is why there are a lot more small WebKit-based browsers than Gecko-based ones, even ignoring mobile). And from what others are saying, Canonical want to use the same rendering engine everywhere, not just in the actual web browser...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    The rendering engines would be closer nonetheless than Gecko and Blink.
    True, but why is that beneficial? The Canonical devs don't have to deal with Gecko at all, they just get finished Firefox packages from Mozilla.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chaz View Post
    True, but why is that beneficial?
    To make sure that web apps behave the same (or at least not totally different) on Ubuntu Phone and Ubuntu Desktop. App authors could inadvertently just test their apps under one engine and the apps may be totally broken under the other.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delgarde View Post
    The Firefox *browser* is good, but the rendering engine isn't very convenient as a component for other apps (which is why there are a lot more small WebKit-based browsers than Gecko-based ones, even ignoring mobile). And from what others are saying, Canonical want to use the same rendering engine everywhere, not just in the actual web browser...
    I would have thought that the framework Mozilla is using for their Firefox OS applications would have been a better choice than using Chromium.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kingston, Jamaica
    Posts
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    I didn't know that they now actually do that. I've read in a blog post about that as an experiment. Too bad we'll be required to swallow 100MB for Chromium dependencies because the Blink fork removed all those low level abstraction layers that makes integrating WebKit into various toolkits so easy.

    Simply basing QtWebKit on Apple's stable WebKit branch probably was just too pragmatic…


    The rendering engines would be closer nonetheless than Gecko and Blink.
    That is not the case. QtWebkit is difficult to maintain. They are always a bit behind upstream Webkit. Also, it seems Chromium/Blink makes integration easier or at least what Digia devs think. We should be able to learn a lot more after the upcoming Qt Dev Days.

    Relevant:
    https://devdays.kdab.com/?page_id=225#67
    https://devdays.kdab.com/?page_id=225#61
    Last edited by jayrulez; 08-12-2013 at 08:44 PM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness View Post
    To make sure that web apps behave the same (or at least not totally different) on Ubuntu Phone and Ubuntu Desktop. App authors could inadvertently just test their apps under one engine and the apps may be totally broken under the other.
    By web apps do you mean programs that are written in HTML (which would use Canonical's Blink fork/wrapper either way) or just shortcuts that open websites in the default browser? They'd be tested for whatever the default is presumably.

    But it is true that the mobile versions of a lot of sites are only tested in Webkit because Apple and Google are so dominant in phones, so if Canonical is making a phone OS then they probably want to use a Webkit browser. And if their phone OS uses Webkit then their desktop OS does too because they're the same. So now that I think about it, yes of course they should switch to Chromium (even though I would say Firefox is much, much better), and they'd better hurry up about it, or they'll have a bunch of users complaining that Ubuntu "doesn't load websites right".

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jayrulez View Post
    That is not the case. QtWebkit is difficult to maintain. They are always a bit behind upstream Webkit. Also, it seems Chromium/Blink makes integration easier or at least what Digia devs think. We should be able to learn a lot more after the upcoming Qt Dev Days.

    Relevant:
    https://devdays.kdab.com/?page_id=225#67
    https://devdays.kdab.com/?page_id=225#61
    QtWebKit is difficult to maintain because Digia branches WebKit trunk every half century or so instead of building on top of Apple's stable branch.

    You second link says what I wrote: They'll bundle practically the whole Chromium.
    Get exited about 100MB of dependencies for web rendering part of Qt alone – pretty hefty for phones without swap…

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Mozilla is working hard on webapps that work across OS's and browsers. Canonical could just contact Mozilla and work together so that apps for Firefox work in Ubuntu.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    173

    Default

    Both browsers are good. MY choice comes down to firefox having better add-ons (i have not found a proper replacement for tree-style tabs).

    Mozilla is also a more neutral entity than google, so i think it suits better as the default browser.
    Last edited by varikonniemi; 08-13-2013 at 07:03 AM.

  10. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qlum View Post
    As a dedicated firefox user who finds chromium just a limited uncustomizable browser can only salute this decision, at least some are still sticking to good old firefox.
    This. I've also always found Webkit based browsers to do a far worse job of rendering the page, things often end up where they clearly shouldn't be.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •