Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Flashrom 0.9.7 Refines Support For A Lot Of Chips

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,824

    Default Flashrom 0.9.7 Refines Support For A Lot Of Chips

    Phoronix: Flashrom 0.9.7 Refines Support For A Lot Of Chips

    Flashrom is the leading way for flashing BIOS/firmware images on hundreds of flash chips, hundreds of motherboards, and dozens of PCI devices. Released today was Flashrom 0.9.7 as the first major update in one year's time and with it comes almost 150 changes to the open-source BIOS/firmware flashing project...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQzNzA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,052

    Default

    This is used to flash your devices (motherboard, graphics card, etc) with firmware.

    It is used to flash coreboot (with SeaBIOS or UEFI payloads, etc) into firmware.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Used this to flash my MSI 990FXA-GD80 motherboard, worked first time

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    794

    Default

    Big love to the flashrom project. (If I wasn't already broke this month I should send a little donation, too) One program to rul... flash them all. And the solution to BIOS and Firnware upgrades on Linux-PCs without having to fiddle around with DOS floppies or even needing a Windows installation just to load a few KB of stuff in a chip.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adarion View Post
    Big love to the flashrom project. (If I wasn't already broke this month I should send a little donation, too) One program to rul... flash them all. And the solution to BIOS and Firnware upgrades on Linux-PCs without having to fiddle around with DOS floppies or even needing a Windows installation just to load a few KB of stuff in a chip.
    Yeah, but it needs to be 100% regression free, and not have any bugs.
    The code really needs to be reliable, audited and verifiable. It would have to require unit testing.
    There would have to be pre-checks, post-checks and verifications and assurances and safety checks to make sure nothing goes wrong.

    I wouldn't want to use some third-party firmware flashing tool and then accidentally brick the hardware.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •