Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: AMD Gallium3D Performance Is Much Better Than Two Years Ago

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,654

    Default AMD Gallium3D Performance Is Much Better Than Two Years Ago

    Phoronix: AMD Gallium3D Performance Is Much Better Than Two Years Ago

    With the imminent release of Mesa 9.2, out this morning are Radeon "R600" Gallium3D driver benchmarks comparing Mesa Git master (9.3-devel) to Mesa 9.2 Git, Mesa 9.1.6, Mesa 9.0.3, Mesa 8.0.5, and Mesa 7.11.2. These are the past two years worth of Mesa releases and testing occurred on an ATI Radeon HD 4890 (RV790XT) graphics card.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19068

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    565

    Default

    Nice, and actual improvements are MUCH, much better. All of these tests were run with the latest kernel and different versions of userspace (Mesa). If each test for a given Mesa version would be run with the current kernel version at the time it was released, results would be both more realistic, and much more impressive.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,666

    Default

    Would have been nice to see how the power usage changed as well, if the last ones have DPM enabled.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    Would have been nice to see how the power usage changed as well, if the last ones have DPM enabled.
    I doubt it, Michael doesnt change from defaults and even if he did, he used the same kernel for all tests. It isnt at all realistic because of that. When people were using 7.11 they definitely werent using that kernel.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    379

    Default

    half the tests have massive regressions

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peppercats View Post
    half the tests have massive regressions
    As noted in the article the changes are likely due to newer features (like MSAA) being available on newer versions of the driver. Older versions of the driver only supported GL 2.1 while newer versions support GL 3.1.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •