Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: AMD Gallium3D Performance Is Much Better Than Two Years Ago

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,552

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gururise View Post
    Excellent article!!

    The ONLY thing keeping me on Catalyst Legacy (instead of r600) in Ubuntu 13.04 is that I had trouble running some of my Humble Bundle games with the OSS drivers (ie. Dungeon Defenders, Shank, Shank2, etc), while the catalyst legacy was able to handle them w/o problems. Also, the Catalyst seems to run Wine with higher compatibility than the OSS drivers.
    Not higher compatibility, but different. Some games work better on one, some on the other.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spstarr View Post
    If there's one game I've played off and on is SL and its performance is poor on my HD 3650. I don't buy these performance improvements in Gallium 3D for this specific GPU. I'd like to see more intensive games that really stress the OpenGL stack show improvements.
    spstarr, are you running with the sb optimizer (R600_DEBUG=sb <program>) ? If not, give it a try.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    IMHO, then tests with these games are useless if you want to show performance differences between driver versions and shouldn't be used. If you want to benchmark different driver versions you change nothing but the driver versions. Using different game settings (even if they are applied automatically) for the different driver versions distorts the benchmark and makes them useless.
    Mesa has the env var overrides to disable extensions, so Michael could easily do a no-MSAA bench.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    20

    Wink New Shader optimizer

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    spstarr, are you running with the sb optimizer (R600_DEBUG=sb <program>) ? If not, give it a try.
    I should try that, you are right...

    Shawn

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    624

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    Mesa has the env var overrides to disable extensions, so Michael could easily do a no-MSAA bench.
    Unfortunately, MSAA cannot be disabled by environment variables completely. You can only disable the GL extensions GL_EXT_framebuffer_multisample and GL_ARB_texture_multisample, but I think you can't disable MSAA through GLX, which is what Nexuiz and other apps use.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vim_User View Post
    If you want to benchmark different driver versions you change nothing but the driver versions. Using different game settings (even if they are applied automatically) for the different driver versions distorts the benchmark and makes them useless.
    I've said that *EVERY* time benchmarks like these come up and nothing has changed. It's like comparing apples and oranges..

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    624

    Default

    It would be extremely difficult to keep track of and disable every new feature. New features can decrease performance as seen with MSAA, but they can also increase performance, which is something I bet you'd like to see in the article.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •