Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: FreeBSD Can Compete With Ubuntu Linux, Windows 8

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,354

    Default FreeBSD Can Compete With Ubuntu Linux, Windows 8

    Phoronix: FreeBSD Can Compete With Ubuntu Linux, Windows 8

    Yesterday I published results that show NVIDIA's Linux driver is very competitive with Microsoft Windows 8 when it comes to OpenGL gaming performance. It turns out that the NVIDIA BSD driver, which is still mostly shared common code with Linux and Solaris and Windows, pairs very well with FreeBSD's Linux binary compatibility layer. The NVIDIA BSD performance is very good for OpenGL as shown in this article with a comparison of Windows 8 vs. Ubuntu 13.10 vs. FreeBSD 9.1. In fact, for some OpenGL workloads the Linux games are running faster on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 9.1 than Ubuntu!

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18989

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    43

    Default

    I wonder how FreeBSD performs with the Source engine games. Unfortunately their compatibility mode doesn't work with steam but I bet there working on it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    336

    Default

    The conclusion has dictated a flame war will soon commence.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    230

    Default

    Wow, if it just had more all round desktop/hardware support, it seems FreeBSD would be a heck of a performer.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Staten Island, NY
    Posts
    27

    Default What about Windows 7?

    How does Windows 7 compete?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ElderSnake View Post
    Wow, if it just had more all round desktop/hardware support, it seems FreeBSD would be a heck of a performer.
    If it had.. but it lacks Catalyst drivers as well, so it would still be far behind. It also lacks sane package management for typical users. It competes well just because Nvidia blob replaces Linux and BSD graphic stack, so performance is the same (+/- differences between graphic environments). I would like to hear the answer coming from FreeBSD developers who are trolls that claimed FreeBSD is faster than Linux in 3D games, because of Linuxulator: why were you lying?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    449

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pawlerson View Post
    If it had.. but it lacks Catalyst drivers as well, so it would still be far behind. It also lacks sane package management for typical users.
    What's wrong with the package tools?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archibald View Post
    What's wrong with the package tools?
    Yup, would be interesting to know. I mean if you switch from Windoze or Ubuntu you probably want to use PC-BSD anyway. There's the AppCafe. Looks and Feels a lot like Ubuntu Software Center to me.
    If you start out with FreeBSD and have no clue of the command line whatsoever than I guess the overwhelming number of really powerful ports mgmt tools is your smallest problem anyway ;o) And for those wanting the "apt-experience" there's always pkgng.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Interesting, but what's the cause for the high performance on FreeBSD?

    What operating system is the PS3 running on? maybe nvidia and sony tinkered around it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tron_ston View Post
    pkg_*shit fetches vulnerable and out of date packages making your system more hack-able. Also no updating or auditing capability not to mention painfully slow

    PKGNG causes conflicts that can only be resolved by re-installing every package (happens when "upgrading"). Also painfully slow. And cannot be used with ports.

    ports is so... slow (slower then Gentoo portage because BSD is naturally slower), messy. Also doesn't work with the piece of crap PKGN(ot)G(ood). and far less powerful and flexible then Gentoo portage. Takes up more disk space and doesn't have a standard management tool like Gentoo's emerge.

    Pawlerson has a point, we certainly can't trust FreeBSD developers to produce useable software. So why should we use FreeBSD. The performance achieved here by PC-BSD has got nothing to do with FreeBSD itself, as what Pawlerson said, it's the NV's stack.
    PC-BSD is just FreeBSD with a customized installer, there is no changes on the system, pkg install binary packages older than the ports packages but they are tested by the FreeBSD team, ports packages are newer but they are not tested and doesn't mean that they more stable or secure just because they are newer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •