Benchmark Liquorix vs Vanilla linux with BFS
Last time I saw a benchmark of Liquorix 3.8.
This kernel is supposed to be a very low latency kernel, but the benchmarks showed very little difference with vanilla kernel.
In Liquorix they switched from BFS back to CFS again, because of some annoying bugs that were related to BFS.
When I look at earlier benchmarks of Liquorix 3.2 I believe the difference between Vanilla and Liquorix was much bigger.
Now I'm wondering if BFS was responsible for this big difference.
Maybe this is an idea for a future article?