Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Linux laptop recommendations

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    97

    Question Linux laptop recommendations

    I want to buy a laptop which will mainly be used to run Linux so I thought it'd be a good idea to try and get some suggestions from the Phoronix forums.

    I'm not a gamer or heavily into gfx - apart from web browsing and watching the odd film its main purpose will be audio production. I'd prefer a quiet n'cool GPU/laptop (versus the extra heat, noise and power drain created from having a discrete GPU) and the fact that Intel seem to employ more people to work on its (open source only) Linux graphics drivers I would prefer an Intel GPU.

    Desired specs include:

    At least 1600x900 display (I can't believe most laptop displays top out at 1366x768 in 2013 - only slightly more pixels than your average smartphone display)

    i5 or i7 CPU

    At least 1 x SATA3 and 1 x USB3

    i4000 (or later) integrated gfx w/ HDMI out

    Gb NIC

    Unless it comes pre-installerd with a fast SATA3 SSD, I'll be swapping out its drive for a good SSD (256GB most likely) so if anyone can recommend a good SATA3 SSD too, that'd be great!

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    97

    Default No such thing as an Intel GFX laptop with a Full HD screen?

    I have managed to find a few laptops with Intel gfx with 1600x900 displays but not one with Intel gfx and a Full HD screen. It seems every laptop with a 1080-capable display also has discrete (NV or Ati) gfx. OEMs don't consider my micro-niche when it comes to laptops it seems!

    The two best fits for my needs I've found so far would seem to be the ASUS F75A-EH51 and the HP Pavilion 17-e032sa. They're both about £500 but I've not been able to find a UK seller of the F75A-EH51 and the Pavilion 17-e032sa loses a point or two for not having a Gb NIC.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,752

    Default

    You might consider the Mac laptops too, as they tend to have high-res displays, while the low-end models do not have discrete graphics. YMMV.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Macs? No thanks. Although I quite like OSX, I've been there before with Macs and don't want to fill their already bulging coffers any more.

    Turns out that Dell produce laptops with 1080-capable displays with Intel GFX but only with 13" screens, which at that size seems like a waste to me as I'd need to squint to see small text, if I could read it at all, so I should add to my required spec 'at least a 15" display @ 1600x900 or higher'.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danboid View Post
    At least 1 x SATA3 and 1 x USB3
    With SATA3 you mean an eSATA port? These are not common any more.

    You can disable the discrete GPU on most laptops so it won't use any power. If you still want a laptop without any discrete graphics, some models of the Lenovo ThinkPad S440 touch (e.g. 20AY-006) may fit your bill.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    97

    Default What is the best 7xxx or 8xxx ATi chipset wrt FLOSS drivers currently?

    chithanh:

    By SATA3 I mean its chipset/internal SATA interface should support SATA3 (aka SATA600). I realise many laptops don't have eSATA (or Firewire, or Thunderbolt) but all those would be welcome additions. Thanks for your suggestion- that Thinkpad sounds good.

    Everyone:

    I read Michael's recent comparison of the various open source Linux gfx drivers and his conclusion was that if you want the best gpu performance using only FLOSS drivers then the Radeon HD6xxx series are the ones to go for. That's OK if you have a desktop machine but you cannot buy a new laptop with a HD6xxx - everything has a 7xxx or 8xxx series GPU these days, if its a laptop using Radeon. Is there an optimal mobile Radeon GPU chipset model these days wrt to completeness (perf. and stability) of its open source radeon drivers?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danboid View Post
    I read Michael's recent comparison of the various open source Linux gfx drivers and his conclusion was that if you want the best gpu performance using only FLOSS drivers then the Radeon HD6xxx series are the ones to go for. That's OK if you have a desktop machine but you cannot buy a new laptop with a HD6xxx - everything has a 7xxx or 8xxx series GPU these days, if its a laptop using Radeon. Is there an optimal mobile Radeon GPU chipset model these days wrt to completeness (perf. and stability) of its open source radeon drivers?
    What Michael meant was "a GPU with the same VLIW architecture as HD6xxx", which includes some HD7xxx parts and may include some HD8xxx parts as well (I haven't really been paying attention to part numbering since changing jobs). Those parts all run the r600 driver.

    Pick something midrange and up from the "Northern Islands" row of the decoder ring in RadeonFeature and you should be fine :

    http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature/#index5h2

    EDIT -- I tried looking up some specific models but apparently the "AMD product finder" on our web site doesn't list systems with Intel CPUs
    Last edited by bridgman; 10-05-2013 at 08:05 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Thanks for your input bridgman!

    I've had another search for ATi laptops today but I've been unable to find a single laptop/notebook/ultrabook with AMD GFX and a Full HD screen - the AMD GPU devices seem to top out at 1600x900 and if you want full HD it seems you have to have NV.

    A lot of the AMD GPU devices also use the AMD A4 CPU but, whilst AMD may make faster GPUs than Intel they don't win in the CPU benchmarks. CPU speed is much more important to me than GPU performance.

    Whilst AMD have won the console GPU wars, they're clearly trailing badly behind NV (and Intel) in getting OEMs to use their mobile GPUs.

    Why oh why do most laptops still only have 1366x768 screens in 2013? Its no better than what we had in 1993. You'd think they'd say "Oh look! Most smartphones have HD screens now so maybe we'd better update our laptop displays so as to make them worthwhile for consuming 12x the space and power to bring them into the 21st century". Nope!

    Another frustrating aspect to the tiresome life of the Linux user hunting a laptop is that all too many sites only list the diagonal size of a laptops display and neglect to mention its res. Its as if they realise how embarrassing their laptop display specs are and so they are trying to cover it up!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lancashire, England
    Posts
    97

    Question 7650M FLOSS drivers status?

    I've found 1 laptop that has both a decent size, 1080 display plus an AMD GPU - the Sony VAIO E17. Its quite affordable too so I'm considering it.

    Apparently it uses the Radeon HD 7650M so can I play (and edit) 1080p video at >30fps and without major probs using the open source radeon drivers on a 7650M currently?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    790

    Default

    There is also the 13.3" ASUS VivoBook U38N which comes with 1920x1080 screen and 7600G (ARUBA, Northern Islands) graphics. The 15.6" MSI GX60 additionally has a 7970M (PITCAIRN, Southern Islands) but I don't know if that is hybrid or discrete-only.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •