And who are you? A bot denying bad things that have come of prior assigning. Like when f...ing Oracle took over SUN and turned open source against its contributors.
You forgot the part where the contributors just jumped the shipped and worked on forks instead. Because that is what can happen on open source projects, regardless if there is a CA/CLA or not. But of course you don't mention that, it wouldn't fit nice into your argumentation.
No, FSF requires CLA for all contributions as well. Honton is apparently more fanatically opensource that RMS. Either that or just making anything up as he goes.
I like your passion. Instead of wasting it on making up things about me, you should spend a few minutes on understanding why FSF wants copyright. They do this to defend the GPL. Legal actions against copyright infringement is much much easier when you are the sole copyright holder. So FSF asking for CA is because they LIKE the GPL and want to protect GPL code. Digias CLA is because Digia don't want copylefted code inside Qt.