Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: AMD Radeon R9 270X On Linux

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,807

    Default AMD Radeon R9 270X On Linux

    Phoronix: AMD Radeon R9 270X

    Earlier this month AMD announced the R9 series graphics cards that included the $200 Radeon R9 270X offering based upon the "Curacao XT" graphics core. This Volcanic Islands graphics card in Microsoft Windows benchmarks has been faster than a Radeon HD 7870, but today we have the first Linux test results and compatibility information available. This article serves as our first Linux review of the AMD R9 270X -- or any Rx 200 series graphics card for that matter -- in the form of the Gigabyte Radeon R9 270X 2GB.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19245

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,371

    Default

    The open source driver already has support for these cards.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Yeah, I don't think it makes a ton of sense to run open drivers in their current state on new cards like this, but it would be good to at least get a report of how well they work. I assume they are to the point where you can just expect them to work on the desktop and for quake 3 based games, and it's just slow and lacking new GL3/4 features that are the primary downsides. Right?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Considering the graph of performance per watt, the AMD's OpenGL driver seems not too bad, actually.

    I'm wondering if one could do a similar graph for APUs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    934

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agd5f View Post
    The open source driver already has support for these cards.
    Yes, but still I'm considering downgrading my 7950

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,371

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    Yeah, I don't think it makes a ton of sense to run open drivers in their current state on new cards like this, but it would be good to at least get a report of how well they work. I assume they are to the point where you can just expect them to work on the desktop and for quake 3 based games, and it's just slow and lacking new GL3/4 features that are the primary downsides. Right?
    The R9 270X is a pitcairn variant so it's the same so they have the same level of suppor as other SI asics.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agd5f View Post
    The R9 270X is a pitcairn variant so it's the same so they have the same level of suppor as other SI asics.
    I read somewhere similar stuff. Only the top end R9 280x and R9 290x are the new stuff. The other ones are rebranded and reclocked HD7000s.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    490

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BSDude View Post
    I read somewhere similar stuff. Only the top end R9 280x and R9 290x are the new stuff. The other ones are rebranded and reclocked HD7000s.
    Yeah, looks like Michael wasn't immune to the rebranding BS, got himself another 7xxx series gpu, unfortunately.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    91

    Default

    R9 280X (Tahiti XTL) is ist basically a modified 7970 Ghz Edition

    The new ones (Hawaii based) will be the R9 290s

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    DG, IL, USA
    Posts
    197

    Default

    opps wrong thread
    Last edited by DarkFoss; 10-22-2013 at 05:48 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •