Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 3-Way RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Benchmarks

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,815

    Default 3-Way RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Benchmarks

    Phoronix: 3-Way RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Benchmarks

    The latest RadeonSI Gallium3D open-source driver benchmarks I have to share are OpenGL performance tests comparing three different Radeon HD 7000 and Radeon Rx 200 series graphics cards between the open-source Mesa 10.0 driver and Catalyst 13.11...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTUwNDY

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: 3-Way RadeonSI Gallium3D vs. Catalyst Benchmarks

    The latest RadeonSI Gallium3D open-source driver benchmarks I have to share are OpenGL performance tests comparing three different Radeon HD 7000 and Radeon Rx 200 series graphics cards between the open-source Mesa 10.0 driver and Catalyst 13.11...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTUwNDY
    As before, Prey results are incredible for a driver which still hasn't been optimised much.

    Reaction Quake always has problems on Mesa for some reason, it's some memory allocation problem.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    As before, Prey results are incredible for a driver which still hasn't been optimised much.

    Reaction Quake always has problems on Mesa for some reason, it's some memory allocation problem.
    Incredible where?? in Gpu Test benchmark?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by verde View Post
    Incredible where?? in Gpu Test benchmark?
    Prey is the last benchmark in the article -- not part of GpuTest. Looks like radeonsi is running ~80% of Catalyst speed, which pingufunkybeat is saying seems pretty good considering that things like HyperZ have not yet been ported across from r600g and that the developer focus so far has been catching up with functionality rather than optimizing for performance.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    552

    Default

    I must say I'm actually impressed with RadeonSI based on this limited benchmark.

    (Yeah yeah, i guess this will be the last time anyone will ever see me ranting about RadeonSI)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Here are my results with radeonsi on my 7770.

    This little thing impressed me actually, beating some of the higher end cards even with catalyst in some benchmarks. (I'm not going to bother testing catalyst right now)

    http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...SO-1311058PT74

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Prey is the last benchmark in the article -- not part of GpuTest. Looks like radeonsi is running ~80% of Catalyst speed, which pingufunkybeat is saying seems pretty good considering that things like HyperZ have not yet been ported across from r600g and that the developer focus so far has been catching up with functionality rather than optimizing for performance.
    This just drives home the fact that Larabel needs to stop relying on the ancient OSS games and use professional games to test against. Lets see the tests done on Half-Life 2:Lost Coast, DOTA2 Test, Metro:Last Light etc.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kivada View Post
    This just drives home the fact that Larabel needs to stop relying on the ancient OSS games and use professional games to test against. Lets see the tests done on Half-Life 2:Lost Coast, DOTA2 Test, Metro:Last Light etc.
    Exactly...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •