Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: DRI2 Direct Rendering Now Available

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    910

    Default

    Default
    Heh, the "only" things missing now are Gallium3d, OpenGl 3 and glucose AND support for all of them in the ati catalyst driver
    Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
    all of them coming today!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    20

    Default

    I'd like to try the new DRI2 when it's usable in either radeon or radeonhd or fglrx. But, ubuntu probably won't have DRI2 until at least the next version in October.

    Is anyone aware of a howto or wiki on installing it from git?

    I've successfully done the git versions of drm and mesa and am using them with radeon on ubuntu 8.04 beta (xorg 1.4) to be able to use EXA. But, I see some dri2 going into xorg 1.5 today, which might mean all xorg has to be from git if I want to try it?

    Any idea when fglrx or radeon or radeonhd will start using it?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by paul View Post
    I'd like to try the new DRI2 when it's usable in either radeon or radeonhd or fglrx. But, ubuntu probably won't have DRI2 until at least the next version in October.

    Is anyone aware of a howto or wiki on installing it from git?

    I've successfully done the git versions of drm and mesa and am using them with radeon on ubuntu 8.04 beta (xorg 1.4) to be able to use EXA. But, I see some dri2 going into xorg 1.5 today, which might mean all xorg has to be from git if I want to try it?

    Any idea when fglrx or radeon or radeonhd will start using it?
    Question is still open, will this be ported to old ddx stuff (i won't do that) or will this need kernel mode setting as to my opinion you want a new drm module for proper memory management (doing this in current one is painfull a should be avoided from my POV).

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yoshi314 View Post
    all of them coming today!
    April fools~!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NeoBrain View Post
    Heh, the "only" things missing now are Gallium3d, OpenGl 3 and glucose AND support for all of them in the ati catalyst driver
    Before the ati catalyst driver those standards support the radeonhd and the radeon driver will be totally complete and 100% stable.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    Oh nice, I'm looking forward to seeing previews for my minimized windows.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    97

    Default

    That's great news! I love it!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    DRI2 Direct Rendering Now Available
    However, to reach this state the DRI interface was broken.

    Not sure I get this statement. Does this mean backwards compatibility was broken or that accelerated OpenGL is hosed?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edged View Post

    Not sure I get this statement. Does this mean backwards compatibility was broken or that accelerated OpenGL is hosed?
    This means that interface btw X server & mesa driver have been broken so that X server git new mesa git or that for new DRI2 you need to rebuild Xserver & mesa (also ddx).

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glisse View Post
    This means that interface btw X server & mesa driver have been broken so that X server git new mesa git or that for new DRI2 you need to rebuild Xserver & mesa (also ddx).
    Thanks for the information, but will this break proprietary/commercial drivers - will those need to be updated to be "compatible" with the new X-server? Or am I looking at this in the wrong way, and it's not a restructuring of the entire layout but rather adding of this newer/better pathway design?

    Further I have one last question if you would indulge
    Do the supporting libraries/interfaces differ so much that it will require apps to be recompiled/relinked to be able to run accelerated under the new environment?

    I ask this, because I went through this already in a 'worst-case scenario' - I was around in the transition between XF86 3.x and 4.x, and frankly it shafted people with low-end boxes, it took ages for drivers to catch-up and all sort of haxies to be able to run commercial binaries (recall q2hack)

    Thanks for your time!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •