Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Radeon Gallium3D Improvements Compared To Legacy Catalyst

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,687

    Default Radeon Gallium3D Improvements Compared To Legacy Catalyst

    Phoronix: Radeon Gallium3D Improvements Compared To Legacy Catalyst

    Recently I published OpenGL benchmark results on Phoronix showing the open-source R600 Gallium3D driver competing with Catalyst for Radeon HD 5000/6000 series graphics cards. For the Radeon HD 7000 series and newer "GCN" graphics cards that are supported by the different RadeonSI driver, the performance has a ways to improve. What wasn't included with those recent Phoronix articles were looking at the performance for the Radeon HD 4000 series GPUs, which is now only supported by the open-source driver and the Catalyst Legacy driver that doesn't work on modern Linux distributions. Therefore, for this article we're looking at the Catalyst Legacy performance on Ubuntu 12.10 (as well as its open-source R600g driver at the time) and compare it to the OpenGL performance found out of the box on Ubuntu 13.10 and then with the latest Linux 3.12 and Mesa 10.0 driver code.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19316

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Kansas.
    Posts
    294

    Default

    While these benchmarks don't apply for my hardware (HD7800 series), its still interesting seeing how far the driver has advanced for older hardware.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    2,672

    Default

    The Daemon-powered Unvanquished game is much faster with the Ubuntu 13.10 drivers than the open-source state one year ago with Ubuntu 12.10, but the Catalyst blob was still faster.
    By a frame?..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    221

    Default and

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    By a frame?..
    by a frame an half lol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    1,941

    Default

    Isn't the 4870 the card that everyone always asks Michael "Whats wrong with your card?" because its performance numbers are out of whack with similar cards?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    366

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrecorreia View Post
    by a frame an half lol
    \begin{irony}
    If that is not reason enough to use Catalyst....
    \end{irony}

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    157

    Default

    In my case, I think source games runs a bit better (hd42000) in linux free driver than in windows (thats something)

    I dont understand how AMD leave us without legacy driver support, that should be illegal, we bought their hardware, and they dont give us updated drivers. Thats not fair at all.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    366

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edoantonioco View Post
    I dont understand how AMD leave us without legacy driver support [...]
    There isn't?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oleid View Post
    There isn't?
    Hasn't been updated since January.

    With these requirements: Automated installer and Display Drivers for Xorg 6.9 to Xserver 1.12 and Kernel version up to 3.4


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edoantonioco View Post
    In my case, I think source games runs a bit better (hd42000) in linux free driver than in windows (thats something)

    I dont understand how AMD leave us without legacy driver support, that should be illegal, we bought their hardware, and they dont give us updated drivers. Thats not fair at all.
    They are providing updated drivers via the OSS radeon driver, nearly fully supporting your hardware [1]. Why should they be required (by law!?!) to maintain two drivers when they have given us (the OSS community) a much better solution than originally provided by fglrx? Besides, if you still want to run the fglrx legacy driver, no one is stopping you from running it on the still supported Ubuntu 12.10.

    [1] Geometry shaders are a WIP, AFAIK. OpenCL support for this class of hardware may never happen. CrossFire support may end up happening via a generic path provided by the DRM render nodes work, but AFAIK noone is working on this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •