Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: NVIDIA 173.08 Linux Display Driver

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,387

    Default NVIDIA 173.08 Linux Display Driver

    Phoronix: NVIDIA 173.08 Linux Display Driver

    Last week it was exclusively reported by Phoronix that a new NVIDIA binary Linux display driver should be out in the next week, and sure enough we were right, again. The NVIDIA 173.08 Linux driver was released last night and features support for several new NVIDIA GPUs, including the GeForce 9800 series, experimental support for X Server 1.5, and a number of fixes with Linux 2.6.25 kernel compatibility.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=12188

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Looking at the gotcha list that I'll run into when I update to Fedora 9 in a few weeks, I am now convinced this closed source driver is beyond lame. When the time is right, I will replace my 8600 GTS with an ATI card (most likely a 3870), there's no way I can keep on dealing with this madness.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default yet another boring release

    I am still waiting for decent 2d support on my 8600m which is still rubbish. So much for investing in a decent gpu:

    http://www.popsci.com/gear-gadgets/a...-graphics-card

    seeing that old crappy intel gpu's do the basics properly thats probably what I'll get, that or an ati card

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by _txf_ View Post
    I am still waiting for decent 2d support on my 8600m which is still rubbish. So much for investing in a decent gpu:

    http://www.popsci.com/gear-gadgets/a...-graphics-card

    seeing that old crappy intel gpu's do the basics properly thats probably what I'll get, that or an ati card
    By the by... The poor 2D rendering may well be due to design issues with the display adapter on your machine.

    I'm not seeing issues with any G60. G70, or G80 parts with 2D rendering yet- this includes mobile parts.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,645

    Default

    remm: Most users would switch to nvidia from ati, but maybe you are more lucky

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    remm: Most users would switch to nvidia from ati, but maybe you are more lucky
    If you are happy about the Linux software and consideration Nvidia gives you, feel free to buy or continue buying

    That's not my situation, I find Nvidia's driver to be buggy, unstable, and annoying to use, so hopefully you won't mind if I walk.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by remm View Post
    If you are happy about the Linux software and consideration Nvidia gives you, feel free to buy or continue buying

    That's not my situation, I find Nvidia's driver to be buggy, unstable, and annoying to use, so hopefully you won't mind if I walk.
    Buggy and unstable... I find that my personal experience is largely OPPOSITE of that right at the moment- but then I'm not trying to do SVGA out and a whole host of other things that are problematic all over the place. Now, having said this, I've found AMD's offerings to be quite a bit closer to that reality than I care to use them with. Things like not being able to play video playback without doing goofy things on a regular monitor aren't exactly bug-free and are much more screwed up than SVGA out, especially in this day and age of HDTV monitors being as cheap as regular TV's and whatnot...

    Now, I don't like the fact that it's proprietary- but AMD's stuff still isn't there yet for most people and actually DOES seem to be buggy, unstable, and annoying to use. Until AMD gets it's act together or Intel delivers a decently performing device, NVidia's about the only game currently in town for most situations in 3D. If you don't like that, bug the crap out of AMD to get their drivers shored up or lend a hand or get someone else to do it on the FOSS drivers for their parts.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Buggy and unstable... I find that my personal experience is largely OPPOSITE of that right at the moment- but then I'm not trying to do SVGA out and a whole host of other things that are problematic all over the place. Now, having said this, I've found AMD's offerings to be quite a bit closer to that reality than I care to use them with. Things like not being able to play video playback without doing goofy things on a regular monitor aren't exactly bug-free and are much more screwed up than SVGA out, especially in this day and age of HDTV monitors being as cheap as regular TV's and whatnot...

    Now, I don't like the fact that it's proprietary- but AMD's stuff still isn't there yet for most people and actually DOES seem to be buggy, unstable, and annoying to use. Until AMD gets it's act together or Intel delivers a decently performing device, NVidia's about the only game currently in town for most situations in 3D. If you don't like that, bug the crap out of AMD to get their drivers shored up or lend a hand or get someone else to do it on the FOSS drivers for their parts.
    Amen Brother. You've pretty much summed up the experiences I've had concerning the state of video drivers in linux.

  9. #9

    Default

    Hi ALL,

    What is the Perfomance speed, with Linux+3D with the new driver?

    With older drivers:
    Wine+COD4=25FPS (640x480) AA=off
    Vista+COD4= 80FPS (800x600) AA=2x

    My graphics card:
    8600M GT

    Linux runs as if it were a TNT2!!! (With older drivers)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    112

    Default

    I'm still wating for my 8600gt to support the same TVout features my 6600gt did. The TVOverScan option does aboslutely nothing with my 8600gt, and the overscan is WAY off the edges.

    mostly @ remm:
    I bought an HD3650 to replace my 8600gt but fglrx 8.3 seems to love completely crashing my computer (I need to try it with 2gb/ram instead of 4, but taking out memory to use a video card is not high on my list of acceptable solutions). fglrx may not be a whole lot better than Nvidia's blob, depending on your setup. When I've been able to get it working 2d performance (dragging a window) is appallingly slow. I'm patiently waiting for radeonHD to progress a bit more, and fglrx 8.4.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •