Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB SATA 3.0 SSD

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uid313 View Post
    It is cheap and a lot faster than a mechanical hard disk drive.
    Not as much faster as you think. Last year we bought V300's to upgrade some old Lenovo laptops. And I don't know how Michael got those test results but pretty much any sequential reads benchmark (AS-SSD for example) will show something utterly disappointing. About 150-170 MB/s on SATA-2 controllers (3 Gbps). I can't recall what exactly we got testing them on SATA-3 (6 Gbps) but it was under 350 MB/s as well. Terrible performance, even for cheap drives. I wrote to Kingston support and they replied it was normal.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    716

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatEmerald View Post
    That's very nice to hear. That's one of the SSD models I was considering as well, but unfortunately the store was out of stock...
    It seems to be the most popular model these days... was thinking of getting one myself. By their official numbers, it should be one of the better performing drives while still relatively cheap, so I'll be interested in seeing this review.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JS987 View Post
    /sigh

    Did you the paper linked in that post? What they did was essentially testing how the drives would respond to 3000 power failures in a row. Seriously, three-freaking-key. If you really care about data integrity, one is too many (that's why you'll never see a server rack without a UPS standing next to it).

    SSDs are the best thing that happened to personal computing since cheap RAM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prodigy_ View Post
    I wrote to Kingston support and they replied it was normal.
    They advertise compressible testing that always yields high throughput, also see my post above.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    375

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prodigy_ View Post
    I don't know how Michael got those test results
    He has another one than you:
    Quote Originally Posted by Licaon View Post
    Regarding Kingston V300 read this post by Maxgadgetguy: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answer....html#11492819

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TAXI View Post
    He has another one than you:
    what?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Licaon View Post
    They advertise compressible testing that always yields high throughput, also see my post above.
    IDK, on my own Intel 520 I get 550 MB/s sequential reads in AS-SSD. Both drives have the same SandForce SF-2281 controller. What gives?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    375

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Licaon View Post
    what?
    Did you read the link you posted? There are two versions of this SSD available and most likely Michael has other results cause he has the Taiwan version while prodigy_ has the China one. In fact that's exactly what the link says:
    v5.0.5 Sandforce version made in Taiwan. This unit will always benchmark just fine
    dramatic difference in performance between China or Taiwan-made models

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prodigy_ View Post
    IDK, on my own Intel 520 I get 550 MB/s sequential reads in AS-SSD. Both drives have the same SandForce SF-2281 controller. What gives?
    read that link

    Quote Originally Posted by TAXI View Post
    Did you read the link you posted?
    I did not understand what you said, not what the link I posted said, mmkay?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TAXI View Post
    most likely Michael has other results cause he has the Taiwan version while prodigy_
    That's quite possible but still very annoying. I already posted results from AS-SSD but I also tried HD Tune and got only 145 MB/s sequential read speed. To put this into perspective, you can get 120 MB/s from a good HDD. And in real life environment... well, these Kingston V300 drives feel somewhat faster than HDDs but not even close to Crucial m4, for example (on the same hardware).

    So I wouldn't recommend Kingston. If you need something cheap and don't really care about write speed, go for Crucial M500.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •