Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 105

Thread: The Linux Kernel SABOTEURS.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Why would those devs try to sabotage the kernel? Can people in prison write letters? It would be nice to send these code examples to Mr. Reiser (or any other kernel devs) and see what he has to say.

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade View Post
    Why not? I am seriously considering it.
    Well... You do understand, for changes to be added into the (official) kernel source, that changes will need to be verified by someone and finally accepted by Linus. What you have asserted here, the kernel developers have ganged up together to make Reiserfs perform badly in Linux.

    So...

    1) You have accused the kernel developers as SABOTEURS (a bunch of SOB). This mean you don't trust them.

    2) If you are helping the maintenance of Reiserfs (3/4), then you should have mail your findings to them and explain to them what they had done wrong. Instead of that, you make accusation that they are a bunch of SOB. This mean, you are not willing to work with them.

    3) If this is how you deals with problem, I doubt kernel developers would trust you either.

    Conclusion, neither you nor the kernel developers would be able to work together.

    Implication, if you became _the_ person maintaining Reiserfs (3/4), that would definitely spell the end of Reiserfs for Linux.
    Last edited by lenrek; 05-17-2008 at 05:09 AM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lenrek View Post
    Well... You do understand, for changes to be added into the (official) kernel source, that changes will need to be verified by someone and finally accepted by Linus.
    No worries. I don't care if it is never accepted by the kernel SABOTEURS.

    Quote Originally Posted by lenrek View Post
    What you have asserted here, the kernel developers have ganged up together to make Reiserfs perform badly in Linux.
    Not all of them,... but yes.

    I would initially be happy to do what Edward Shishkin is doing.

    Since he is doing this, I have not got to learn the code.

    What I would like to do is develop Reiser's idea of "the filesystem = the database."

    So far there has been no motivation to get stuck in,... so its all just maybes...

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    76

    Default

    I always thought Xenu was behind the sabotage-acts on the linux-kernel. Or maybe unicorns.

    You destroyed my fancy conspiracy-theory!

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Some people in this thread are causing a worldwide tin shortage with their haberdashery.

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade View Post
    No worries. I don't care if it is never accepted by the kernel SABOTEURS.
    It would be your own fork. So, have fun with it then...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade View Post
    ... Not all of them,... but yes.
    So... Not all of them? Then, they just remain silent about this issue? Or, maybe they are not that smart enough to notice this, only you saw this problem?


    Quote Originally Posted by Jade View Post
    ... What I would like to do is develop Reiser's idea of "the filesystem = the database." ...
    Hans Reiser is an asshat

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MamiyaOtaru View Post
    Some people in this thread are causing a worldwide tin shortage with their haberdashery.
    We, the EAC... Erm... Sorry, we don't exists. Oh... Oops...

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lenrek View Post
    It would be your own fork. So, have fun with it then...
    When is a fork, not a fork?

    No one is actively working on Reiser4. No one. So my fork would be simply a bend in the only road. Not a fork at all, really.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lenrek View Post
    So... Not all of them? Then, they just remain silent about this issue? Or, maybe they are not that smart enough to notice this, only you saw this problem?
    Most of them probably never noticed.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade View Post
    When is a fork, not a fork?
    Well, if it is a fork, then it is a fork. Unless, you are trying to fork into something that is not a fork?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade View Post
    No one is actively working on Reiser4. No one. So my fork would be simply a bend in the only road. Not a fork at all, really.
    Sure... Go ahead, no one stopping you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •