Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Ubuntu 8.04 KVM Benchmarks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,627

    Default Ubuntu 8.04 KVM Benchmarks

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 8.04 KVM Benchmarks

    Back in January of 2007 we had looked at Linux Virtualization Performance as we had compared a running native OS (at that time, Fedora Core 6) against the same operating system running as a virtualized guest OS using Xen, QEMU with the (once closed-source) kqemu kernel module, and then KVM. In this testing we had found that KVM had performed well and won a number of the tests, but it wasn't the clear winner nor it had won by a substantial margin. However, the Kernel-based Virtual Machine had premiered with the Linux 2.6.20 kernel and it has matured quite a bit over the past year and a half since its christening. With that said, we are in the process of conducting new Linux virtualization benchmarks to see how these various implementations compare today. While the full comparison isn't yet ready, due to much interest surrounding Linux virtualization on desktops and servers, this morning we are publishing some initial benchmarks from the Phoronix Test Suite when running Ubuntu 8.04 LTS as the host OS and then running it as the guest operating system with hardware-based acceleration through KVM.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=12348

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    401

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Ubuntu 8.04 KVM Benchmarks

    While the full comparison isn't yet ready, due to much interest surrounding Linux virtualization on desktops and servers, this morning we are publishing some initial benchmarks from the Phoronix Test Suite when running Ubuntu 8.04 LTS as the host OS and then running it as the guest operating system with hardware-based acceleration through KVM.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=12348

    I wouldn't dare touching the partitions on my work laptop. So, I installed Kubuntu using the "wubi installer". It installs _inside_ the Windows partition but gives you an ordinary grub menu, and, apparently runs natively. Please, compare with that one too! The installation ease is superior to virtual machines, to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    154

    Default

    It's good to see that the performance of virtual machines is improving. I might have to try this with my next system since none of my current ones running linux support hardware virtualization.

    Edit: Do'h was reading results wrong nvm
    Last edited by Max Spain; 05-16-2008 at 01:36 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Max, less is best in all those tests. But the performance difference is so low, that...

    I wanna see the multicore results.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    353

    Default

    KVM users may be interested in the article:

    QEMU (The Kernel Virtual Machine) and Windows Vista.

    http://linuxhelp.150m.com/win/qemu-vista.htm
    http://linux.50webs.org/win/qemu-vista.htm

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default IO access

    These benchmarks are quite interesting, but the real point of virtualization is IO performance.

    I'm waiting to see an IO (network and Disk) benchmark in KVM/XEN/VMware

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jecuendet View Post
    These benchmarks are quite interesting, but the real point of virtualization is IO performance.

    I'm waiting to see an IO (network and Disk) benchmark in KVM/XEN/VMware
    True. All those tests are 100% in userspace, so no wonder there is practically no slowdown. Running some more complex workload, which makes more transitions between kernel & user mode, would reveal interesting data.

    Here are few benchmarks of KVM that I did when it was first released, Windows running under Linux: http://www.linuxinsight.com/finally-...for-linux.html

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Michael et al,...

    Did you guys do any comparisons between Windows under KVM-Qemu and native Windows?

    I would love to see some comparisons.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Did you guys do any comparisons between Windows under KVM-Qemu and native Windows?

    Well, at least it would be good to know if you plan to do any.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    353

    Default

    This may be of some interest:

    Compiling the Kernel Virtual Machine (version 71).

    http://linuxhelp.150m.com/compile/qemu-kvm-71.htm
    http://linux.50webs.org/compile/qemu-kvm-71.htm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •