Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: Steam on linux mentioned by Steam moderator

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    The post in the Steam forums reads as he means DoD: S being ported, not Steam directly. So I'll guess the Valve games will be avaible from launch.
    I doubt Valve would want to launch their distribution method with none of there games there to cash in on the new market.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6

    Default

    I'd be much more interested in them delivering games via APT, secure authenticated over TLS if they're worried about people stealing their games.

    We already have excellent package management on our OS's, just because Windows is crap doesn't mean we should need a whole platform for content delivery just to play and keep up-to-date their games.

    Granted, the rest of the platform has /some/ value, even if I despise walled-garden networking. If Steam Friends became a Telepathy interface, so we could use our existing messaging systems in-game, now that would be phenomenal. Never gonna happen though, not many companies "get" us, yet.

    Will be interesting to see how this pans out anyway.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alex-weej View Post
    I'd be much more interested in them delivering games via APT, secure authenticated over TLS if they're worried about people stealing their games.

    We already have excellent package management on our OS's, just because Windows is crap doesn't mean we should need a whole platform for content delivery just to play and keep up-to-date their games.

    Granted, the rest of the platform has /some/ value, even if I despise walled-garden networking. If Steam Friends became a Telepathy interface, so we could use our existing messaging systems in-game, now that would be phenomenal. Never gonna happen though, not many companies "get" us, yet.

    Will be interesting to see how this pans out anyway.
    Not all people use distros with APT.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Not all people use Linux. What's your point?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alex-weej View Post
    Not all people use Linux. What's your point?
    What I meant is, if Valve brings Steam to Linux, they shouldn't use APT as not all distros use APT

  6. #16

    Default

    Personally I would prefer them having some closed downloads area on some site where you can download stuff with your account and then have "fetch restrictions" in the package manager, so that you got to fetch the files by hand if they don't want to allow "downloads for everyone".

    This way every distribution could handle the files they want to handle them, eg Gentoo can create an ebuild for it, Debian some adaption to apt and the RPM based distris one working for them.

    IMO steam in general does not have this much benefits for a Linux user since we already do have package managers. And providing a package manager with updates capabilities is the major benefit for Windows users. (Strange OS not to offer a decent package manager... )

    But even if it is a plain port of steam (the package manager, "webshop"/game distribution and drm system known from Windows) to Linux and OSX, it will still be a benefit for many Linux users, since it allows publishers to see that there are users who buy (native) Linux software. Somehow I would not be suprised if the numbers of Linux users reported in the system survey after it is out would indicated that a percentage close to the numbers of vista users is using Linux...

    Short version:
    Yes, it would be great if the *content* normally offered by steam could just be handled by all the package managers directly and not just via steam. Though this is probably unlikely to happen .

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alex-weej View Post
    I'd be much more interested in them delivering games via APT, secure authenticated over TLS if they're worried about people stealing their games.
    As a content delivery system, apt would be a poor choice for large files. Apt does not download files in chunks like steam does. Steam downloads large files much like bittorrent does, the large file is treated like a bunch of individual identically sized pieces and upon delivery of each individual piece it's checksum is checked using SHA1.

    There is nothing stopping steam from determining the packaging system utilized by a distro. Steam could easily detect the OS and choose the appropriate package type much like it detects if the version of windows is requesting the game and it downloads the appropriate build for that system (ie 32-bit or 64-bit).

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    906

    Default

    Here's a wild suggestion. But what IF the Steam "protocol" (a la BitTorrent) could be added to "package kit"? Many distributions have shown interest in it as a unified "frontend" to different package managers. What if Steam could be handled just as another repo, with its own "protocol" (added to Package Kit, through a small package (.deb, .rpm, .tgz or ebuild) and using Steam accounts to download the content. This very same "steam" package could also include a library to identify Steam signed packages at run time to authenticate it (preferably off-line). But there is no telling how are they going to implement it.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanovic View Post
    Yes, it would be great if the *content* normally offered by steam could just be handled by all the package managers directly and not just via steam. Though this is probably unlikely to happen .
    Yes, it's very unlikely to happen.

    Guys, it's a fact of reality that you've got a dozen or so packaging systems, all different- and we won't get into the deltas between RPM and DEB distributions. What all of you are asking for is a support nightmare. It'd be one thing if we had only ONE packaging system. As it stands, they have a unified means for installing and uninstalling titles from LGP, Runesoft, etc. so I suspect that you're going to find Steam no different. What's important is being able to consistently install and uninstall it over a wide range of systems. Making it do this via your disparate packaging systems, since this stuff ISN'T developed specifically for Fedora, SuSE, Ubuntu, or others, doesn't make as much sense, save for you having a one-stop shop to do EVERYTHING from. Nice, but not practical.

    Keep wishing, but don't expect it anytime soon.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    671

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thetargos View Post
    Here's a wild suggestion. But what IF the Steam "protocol" (a la BitTorrent) could be added to "package kit"? Many distributions have shown interest in it as a unified "frontend" to different package managers. What if Steam could be handled just as another repo, with its own "protocol" (added to Package Kit, through a small package (.deb, .rpm, .tgz or ebuild) and using Steam accounts to download the content. This very same "steam" package could also include a library to identify Steam signed packages at run time to authenticate it (preferably off-line). But there is no telling how are they going to implement it.
    Great idea, but i dont think valve would allow it. Having people write their own 10000 different open source steam frontends written in gtk+ wouldnt sound good to them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •