![]() |
|
|||||||
| Phoronix Test Suite Discussion & collaboration on the Phoronix Test Suite software and specification. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I saw the news title I was secretly hoping it's new shots from UT3. But, interesting news nevertheless!
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm concerned about the relevance of windows tests if a compatibility layer like cygwin is used.
I think a such issue could easily deserve PTS' credibility in the benchmarking (small) world more than a windows version could serve PTS. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just wonder, why Gentoo's PTS is hard masked
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think this is really cool, because now we can compare virtualization solutions under win and linux (and you can add a leval to that : windows under linux/windows/mac, linux under linux/windows/mac etc...), performance between bench under win and wine, and things like that. Maybe they're will be too much interesting things to test, but that's great anyway !
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hope the Phoronix staff is fair enough to use the Server-Editions of Windows. Otherwise this will be quite devastating... alot Windows Benchmarks even run faster under Wine than directly under Windows (Desktop-Editions).
It has to do with Windows actually reserving cycles for lowlatency task(like audio/video), while Linux doesnt care for anything else but throughput (and thus benchmark scores). |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are you serious?
![]() The taskbar looks like KDE3 with compositing and the advantages of the KDE4 taskbar without the disadvantages + some enhancement KDE4 should take over. The fact that the Windows 7 'Kicker' icon lights up like the sun made it look like shit though... They should not have done that... And the there is the Window decoration. Geniusly placement of the buttons. And then windows are ofcourse windows so making them look like glass was just plain genius from a design perspective too. The close, minimize and maximize buttons look like the rest of the glass because the color red would be too distracting but when the mouse is on there it glows red. And the Window decoration is not just transparent, because that way you'd be annoyed by the content underneath it, but blurred to make it even more look like a Window. And then, finally, on every OS you have an ugly looking toolbar with 'File, View, Help, etc'. Apple thought that they were so smart by placing it on top of the screen, but that is annoying too if you have to move your mouse a lot. So Microsoft just auto-hide it and everytime you need it just press 'Alt'. Look I am not a Microsoft fan at all! But give credit where it's due... |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Window decoration? Please. The fact you need it wider than 1 px is evidence of failure to manipulate windows efficiently - like the Alt+left-drag to move a window or Alt+right/middle-drag to resize them. (*waves at OS X users*). There's still no easy way to make random window "always-on-top" without third-party utils or direct involvement from the app's vendor. I don't find multiple desktops particularly useful but not having them at all, I dunno... There are (lots of) things I'll praise Windows for (ABI compatibility making portable apps possible; allowing the user to install apps into whatever directory they feel like; auto-inflating swapfiles; power management; wifi management that doesn't break in every other version, simplistic GUI-driven utils for the one time you need something simple; dead-simple filesharing; after-the-fact compressed folders; on-line defragmenting...). But window management is one of those things "so exceedingly simplistic that only a caveman would want to use them." I'm looking forward to graphics benchmarks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|